The XP-50 has performance that is very similar to the Bf.109 F-4 and shares the same battle rating.
Also players with 10 kills and no deaths are usually working together in a team or they just have a lot of experience.
It is not. As @Metrallaroja said, the in game F4U-4 is modeled with 1945 settings, from WW2.
2 Likes
Then f4u 4 should be set to 5.7 and the other monster friend should be set to f4u 4b 6.
edit: I am in favor of regulating aircraft such as the fw 190 d13. It can be pulled to 5.7.
The F4U-4B is significantly superior to the F4U-4, with much better performance due to a significantly more powerful engine and superior firepower as well.
There should not be just a 0.3 BR difference between these two aircraft.
1 Like
:) Even though it is not among the WW2 planes, the rest does not concern me much.
But I know that plane is a UFO.
You have never touched a single US plane according to the statistics on your account.
So unless you have created multiple accounts, you do not have a good idea of how these planes perform.
Keep in mind, making multiple accounts is against Gaijin’s terms of service:
3.4. The User shall not create multiple Accounts.
You thoroughly refute the cope. If they spent as much effort in improving their flying as they do in generating excuses in the forum, then they would not be succumbing to fighters in battles as frequently.
You have nothing to offer other than reducing the issue to whether you know the game or not.
See, I wasn’t alone in this. Most friends who currently play simulation battles know me.
A gang on the forum is promoting injustice with the support of the management and the game producers.
you know, friends. Keep playing with bombers.
You can only console yourself by destroying the bombers and planes that came into service in 44 years with the superior performance machines of 46 47 48 49 years.
I don’t have any friends. Haha, the important thing is not the friend, look, people call f4u 4b a ufo.
They have exactly the same thought. The same problem applies to d30. Valid within c 10. c10’s br should be at least 4.7, your friend called d30 should be at least 5.7. Frankly, I would not have a problem if the BR 5.7 in the D13 was upgraded from other axis planes.
Those tests you did were also intentional. I can’t see the high speed rotation graph in them. You know, like the BF109 with its tail locked. I can’t see the effects of high speeds on the graphics. Keep playing like Robocop. You can only create perception here. Most of the graphs you put up have no practical meaning. You can also use cheats, though I wouldn’t be surprised. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone who is so passionate about dueling uses cheats.
no problem. f4u 4 entered service in early 1945. Now let’s be enlightened by specifying the months March, April and May.
Yes my friend, you are admitting it with your own language again, this corsair f4u-4 br must be 5.7. Not 5.3. Even though the game focuses on modern vehicles, even if intermediates are released, it should be higher than 5.7.
1 Like
🤡 👋🏻
it’s beginning to get on my nerves. there are so many basic problems in sim mode:
- too few spaces
- bad functions to start battles
- terrible nation lineups
- economy, usefull action
- problems with the AI units
- problems with foresight
…and more.
so please just stop with this nonsense here.
I don’t like people who talk like they’re neutral.
But there are so many crazy people here that they say g14 and d30 are at the same level. The tests that have been carried out supposedly show no difference between these with their flashy graphics, and they even claim that the performance of these old model planes is better than the new model planes. (He immediately started working while writing a comment to the other friend)
These guys have officially become a gang here. I have struggled a lot with people with this type of character problem.
Even vehicles that create instability in the game can be removed from accessibility. like panther 2.
Look, he started his job again.
He also shamelessly accused him of being a Nazi fan or something. IMMORAL PERSON.
I ask the moderators to give the necessary punishment to this dishonorable person.
If it were up to immoral people like you, F86s wouldn’t cause any problems. Again, about that, he adds, “Since F86 rotates worse at low speeds, BF 109s can easily fight with it” and he also adds graphics below, here you go, there is no error in the game, you don’t know how to play, bla bla bla.
If it were up to our friend, who is a member of the forum gang and has mental problems like this, Leopard 1 Panther D might come across him. Because Leopard 1’s armor is weak and it can be fought easily, he does not see any problems with this.
I say again, the producers are spoiling these.
Although I noticed a new game on Steam (or not ?), I guess they have a new game in the works. If there is a game in which such imbalances are eliminated, the transition can be made. This friend can experience pleasure and orgasm instead of hunting g6s and 14s with d30.
OK, then I’ll discuss it now too :D
You don’t have to calculate the P-51 D-30 in horsepower but in camelpower. so 30% more over the desert
ok, joking aside :) so Bf 109 G: we have several airworthy Bf 109s here in Germany. an E-4, a G-6, two extremely modified aircraft with Rolls Royce engines and two more with Rolls Royce engines were converted by the Messerschmitt Foundation with Daimler Benz engines. Unfortunately I only have books and links in German.
there is extensive flight experience. Even the G-6 engine is so powerful that it pushed the testers into their seats more than expected. Don’t underestimate your Bf 109
Keep in mind that in War Thunder the aircraft are changed update after update after update. the current aircraft are just a snapshot.
So there is no reason to insult each other here.
3 Likes
The man defends an injustice that is clearly evident in the game, as if he is playing us for fools, by filling it with graphics that are practically worthless and documents that reveal his own deception. This is a situation that I cannot stand.
When all the manipulation he has done is revealed, it is not enough and he takes things to insulting levels by saying that there is no gasoline in the Luftwaffe and that he is a Nazi.
The man has such a talent for manipulation that he can make us believe that the BF 109 K4 and F86 are equal, and that the F86 is actually a worse plane than the K4 because it cannot turn at low speeds, and therefore the K4 is actually a better plane. Joseph Gobbels is a rookie compared to this guy.
1 Like
you insult him but also violently my friend.
Yes. His skullcap fell off and he looked bald.
Didn’t we send you a link? My friend hasn’t seen d30 ww2. d20 and 25 saw combat. Didn’t it even say in the article we linked to that these planes were used in the Korean War?
I don’t understand what these moderators do. The man constantly insults me and shamelessly calls me a Nazi fan. How many times do I have to complain for it to be rewarded?
Now he started insulting. Because you’re out of arguments. You can bray as much as you want. There is obvious injustice.
I even need to open a topic about tanks. A device called EBR 1954 was added to the tank simulation between 4 and 5. Everyone knows that speed is everything in tank simulation battles. Although they also added a tool called pt76, which is still active at the time.
I’m tired of dealing with these brats.
1 Like
If the P-51 D-5 and P-51 D-20 were given their 150 octane fuel and historically accurate 75 inches of manifold pressure then their in-game performance would be identical to the P-51 D-30. I’ve gone over this dozens of times with you…but you deliberately misunderstand the point.
Your first post in this thread was calling me a slur. Stop trying to play the victim.
This topic is not about tanks at all. The only reason you keep bringing it up is to feed your sense of victimization. It has nothing to do with anything that has been mentioned in this thread.
1 Like
Don’t tell me about gasoline pressure or high octane gasoline. In other words, the plane was named d5 d10 d15 20 25 30 for hobby purposes at that time. So, you are saying that the tail locking has not been resolved, the tail has not been strengthened, etc.?
Frankly, I wouldn’t be offended if the truth, whatever it is, was added to the game. For example, it is wrong that the d13 plane is 5.3. Even though he has a rotational disability that would make a person have a seizure.
There is definitely a difference between planes. What I want, of course, is to add aircraft according to which aircraft are on duty on which date, in order to avoid injustice, ESPECIALLY IN SIMULATION BATTLES, taking into account some balances. This is what I’ve been talking about for a long time. I feel like I’ve been made a fool of.
Am I an idiot that I should fight against planes whose performance and year of entry into service are at a higher level than me, at least in the game, on the game (since it is no different to you, in reality)?
If some tools in the game disrupt the balance too much, they are removed from use. like panther 2.
The tank issue is out of place but another problem.
1 Like
The high octane fuel is where all of the performance difference comes from. The only visual difference is the addition of the dorsal fin in front of the tail and it has no effect on the in-game flight model. This is also a piece that was retrofitted on D-5s in the field as well.
None of the Fw-190Ds are especially strong for their battle rating. Being able to roll around like fidget spinner does not end up being especially useful… especially at the skill level of most players.
You would not want that at all for the simple reason that all late War German props would end up getting stomped into the ground. The P-51 D-5 would run 150 octane and remain at the same battle rating.
The LF IX Spitfire would remain at the same battle rating opposite Bf.109 G-14. The Tempest Mk.V would also be reduced to where the G-14 is. And same with the Mk.14 Spitfire, and it would run 21-25 inch/lbs of boost and climb as well as the LF IX while also being faster and better accelerating than the Bf.109 K-4.
The P-38L would also use 150 octane and would get around 2000hp per engine instead of the 1550hp that it has in game. Imagine nearly P-38K performance with the boosted control surfaces and dive brakes of the P-38L.
Yes you are.
Firstly because you have been complaining about having to fight planes that have performance levels that are nearly identical to yours and that have performance that matches their historical counterparts; i.e a 1944 Bf.109 having to fight a 1944 Spitfire, or the same plane having to fight a 1945 Mustang that is for all intents and purposes identical to the 1944 Mustang; Gaijin could literally change the skin on the D-30 and rename it D-10 and it would be the exact same plane…but now it satisfies your WWII Nazi fetish.
Secondly because you have not even thought of the implications of correctly modeling everything based on historical accuracy. Germany would not do any better than it currently does. In fact it would probably be worse off if it was forced to fight in a historical simulation because all of the ridiculously under tiered planes on the axis side would have to be changed.
No longer would Italy have the best tech tree P-47 variant at a lower BR…nope that is now in KOREAN WAR VETERAN matchmaker. Same goes for basically every minor nation tech tree. By your logic the S-199 should be tiered with super props due to it’s service date even though it’s the worst version of the Bf.109 ever produced.
No longer would Germany be paired up in joint battles with Japan either. No more Ki-84, J2M2, and Ki-61 to curb stomp the competition.
2 Likes
I can compensate for my stupidity by not fighting with planes that are stronger than me. However, since the issue of mental retardation is largely congenital, I cannot recommend much to you. as fate.
Frankly, it would be better without Japanese planes. They just go around in simple ways and steal my clay. You know your spinning heroes well in your duels where you spin like a pinwheel :)
Don’t exaggerate this monster you call spitfire lf. The biggest talent of the friends who use it is that they keep going back and forth. Thank God we can escape because the German planes are a little fast. It is difficult to say the same thing against American planes. It’s like a dream.
Frankly, encountering equivalent aircraft is not a problem for me. However, as I said, I am in favor of not adding project planes that are excessive, such as the P38 K series (we shot a nice dulleo at high altitude with the K4) as you said. as well as the extreme performance LF series aircraft. When German planes were tampered with, they were made in both menthol and nitrogen-supported models. I don’t know if it is included in this game, but this type of aircraft is added against the LF model. Or it can be removed from the series and this arduous task is avoided.
This pretty much sums up your entire position.
You do not really care about historical accuracy. The only thing that you care about is ensuring that the planes you face can never give you even a modicum of competition.
The Spitfire LF IX, Tempest Mk.V, P-38L, and P-51 D-5/10/20 are all directly contemporary to the Bf.109 G-14 and would have been using 150 octane fuel and higher engine settings after D - Day. But you don’t want to fight those…no you want to use idealized versions of German planes to fight exclusively slower Allied planes with engine power settings that were only used prior to D-Day.
The Bf.109s that we have in the game already run their maximum engine settings. The Bf.109 K-4 runs a 1.98 ATA setting that was only possibly used in the last few months of the war, and not the more common 1.80 ATA setting.