The III/IV is fake because the hybrid they built IRL used a IB hull
The WT wiki itself acknowledges that
3 Likes
Hmm…
I think it’s not the nerfs the issue, but the overall level of toptier that is evolving… Like the reload rate of almost every nation getting buffed in the past 2 years, going from around6-6.5s to 5-5.5s.
Talking about load out restrictions. So if what your saying is true than it’s more of a reason to give the f14B aim54c+ so it wouldn’t be load out restricted
why are the z-19 and z-19E uptiered to 11.7 with less missiles and worse missiles than all of the apaches while still maintaining a higher BR.
Because people keep crying about TY-90s
Funny, you just confirmed that the gepard is good where it is
Welcome to the hell leopards and abrams where stuck in, alone since a good while
Missing the MG port is accurate. The vehicle still survives today (they put the original turret back on). What’s inaccurate is that it’s modelled as a single continuous plate. I couldn’t tell the thickness of this cover, or even if this cover is simply a flimsy piece of structural grade steel, but it should be modelled as a weak spot.
The other inaccuracy is the fact Gaijin made it a Sherman IV when it should be a IB. Which means it has the same speed and HP as the M4A1 and M4. Those would be decent nerfs.
7 Likes
Funnily enough, this has already been reported and dismissed at least twice lol
Sweden never had a Sherman IV in the first place
Apparently these pics are of the hybrid Sherman they tested in Sweden and the number on the back of the hull identifies it as a IB hull
(The MG port hadn’t been blanked when those pics where taken)
Back
False, the Gepard is not the start of radar SPAA, the M163 is. If high tier SPAAs had reasonable BRs, then the Gepards would start at 9.0 or 9.3.
Glad Smin already confirmed your opinion is wrong , and that needed br changes of that magnitude would already be reflected
Cause if the m163 us your.
Nearly no nation would have 8.3 spaa able to counter ballsitic cas.
Listen to yourself jesus
3 Likes
Bud, you’re aligning your opinion with a spreadsheet that said the Zeros need to be raised again.
The only nations that would lack 8.3 SPAA coverage would be Germany, Britain, and France. That’s only thee nations, and btw all three have good CAP options at 8.3 so they wouldn’t be helpless either way.
Your entire argument is based off a lie.
Buzz off, dont ruin my premium hornet.
2 Likes
9 Likes
I don’t like the spreadsheet, but I trust you even less.
7 Likes
That’s the least likely outcome, especially considering Gaijin likes making money. So being overly worried about something that’s incredibly unlikely to happen is just unnecessary. Kick rocks.
All those fox 3 spammers at 13.3 could easily be 13.7 but here we are with all the pay 2 win stuff for 80 bucks.
It’s more about exploring what each nation could potentially receive instead of just getting another Su-30 at 13.3. These premiums are going to happen whether we like it or not, so we might as well try to influence the outcome rather than end up with another Belgium F-16AM or, as I mentioned before, another Su-30.
1 Like
Either of those are preferable outcomes to destroying premiums players have already bought.
If they add a bad premium, don’t buy it.
Is completely different to buying a good premium, then people complain and get it turned into a bad one.
2 Likes