Hello.
Yes, you can read our response from the Offical Gaijin Entertainment account on X: https://x.com/GaijinEnt/status/1916577746375070147
“We have no idea what is shown on this photo, where and when it was taken, or even if it is real or fake. Gaijin has not authorized any War Thunder real-world events this Spring. Anyone can print a sticker and slap it on a truck to spin a story out of nothing.”
k . . . . lol, nothing personal man, just that this is not what many seem to make it out to be, that’s all
I thought the H-34 uptier meant the American one, but actually only the French H-34 was uptiered what the heck 💀
Thank you . . ☻
As written in the last reconciliation round:
As a power user (in the past) of the Italian D-30 i have to admit that if you have enough experience the air brake is actually really helpful - but for the average wt player (which should determine the BR) it looks like not decisive and is imho not worth a BR step lower.
I mean the BR reduction of the F8F-1 was argued with “worst combat performance of any BR 5.0 aircraft” and “low burst mass” - in this case they have not even mentioned reasons.
From a balance perspective i see this critical in full or partially downtiers - especially if you play vs JP teams on Pacific maps as the plane is (almost) unkillable even in a full uptier by any JP plane due to the the speed advantage at 7 km+.
So i wrote:
I flew just for fun 12 matches in the US D-28:
13:0 player kills
9 victories, 2 ticket defeats and i landed and j out in another
And this by a slightly above average player using a HOTAS - the really good pilots will most likely spam the plane and dominate lobbies in downtiers.
Of course. As to be expected
I was looking for information about this, I was pulling 600 points per bomb strike just before this patch, now I lucky if I get a third.
Ru 9.0 is way too bloated lol having four mbts, one strong heavy tank and one very good light tank, meanwhile British has one foreveralone 9.0 MBT and nothing else lol
Merkava 2D on 10.0?
Well… I hate this balance logic
The only reasonable thing I could think of is they moved the 435 so 7.7s doesn’t have to see it in an uptier, which isn’t a bad thing because current 7.7 suffers greatly due to compression, but then the 435 imo is a mediocre 8.7 to begin with, it will be outclassed by everything at 9.0, they could give it the 3bm28 like the T-62M1 or increase the reload speed to 7.5 ace and retain its m735 equivalent, I mean this thing clearly not equal to ZTZ88A/B variants lmao they should be at least .3 or .7 difference
Thank you for answer
Russian Bias strikes again, friend.
P-47D-28/30 doesnt needs airspawn
F-4E has access to AGM-65B, which I guess is kindof a big deal for Ground RB
So we are no furhter forward with
Chieftains all variants armour value updates
Chieftain MK5 LRF
Chieftains all variants engine fixes.
Cr1/2 lists of bug reports that I cant even rhyme off but respectfully @Morvran Knows most of them.
Chinese MBTs : incorrect armour layouts / gaps in the armour.
Leclerc : reports still open from god knows when.
Shir 2 : missing ammo types as well as ready rack.
No overall decompression of GRB or ARB to accomodate newer platforms.
GRB is overall incredibly compressed as can be seen between the 9.0 to 11.3 area where it is chaos.
top tier compression, unfortunately the newer models of hte leopard 2a7 and strv 122s are quite a step above the competition, they are not equal to leclercs, CR2s, Type 10s, WZ1001s etc they are objectively better bar in possibly sheer mobility.
The list could go on and on.
Please listen to us
Is that not for GRB though? the F4E has access to a substantially better kit than the mig23s.
This all worked when there was no Pantsir, yes, you could rise to a height of 7-8 km and strike from there, but Pantsir will not let you do this. In general, it seems to me that the BR of US aircraft should be lowered because they are playing against Pantsir.
MiG-23 does not play against Pantsir.