Update 2.39.0.67: Battle Ratings Implemented

Agreeable

I don’t understand why such crap as AMX-A1(premium) has 11.3 on ARB like a MiG-23mld
You have no acceleration, no speed, no turn, no missiles except 2 with very high G which are incredibly sensitive to flares. You won’t reach the base because everything is much faster than you, you won’t survive until they respawn because everyone flies to you like bees to honey seeing your defenselessness on this shitty platform.
Does anyone out there still have a residual amount of common sense or have they completely lost it?

I don’t know what kind of animals are flagging this but I hope it clears your intestines

2 Likes

You know, I wish I had mentioned something sooner during the discussion before they released. But I don’t understand the TT BR ratings and positioning of the ZSU-23-4M4 and the Strela-10M2. While the Strela’s missile has better overload it has a shorter lock on range in all aspect. I feel like the two vehicles should be switched around in the tech tree.

Have you lost your mind? The Strela-10M2 has photocontrast, allowing it to lock onto planes from much further away (especially helis). Not to mention a photo contrast lock can NOT be flared/chaffed in any way. If anything the Strela needs to go up in BR now after these changes. The ZSU-23-4M4 could also go up a step in BR if they don’t fix its instantaneous turn on launch. However giving it more manpads in the hull would also be nice tbf.

I’m going off their stat card in game. The 9M37M missile of the Strela lists a lock in range all aspect of 1.99 miles compared to the 9M39 missile of the ZSU which has a range of 3.73.

1 Like

The lock range is that of the IR lock mode, not the photo-contrast mode. In photo contrast I’ve seen it gain locks at 6km or more sometimes. Not to mention it can’t be outpulled and can’t be flared at all.

4 Likes

In general the br.changes are good, we can now play the 9.3 line-ups (ground br). This is a step in the right direction. Perhaps the one thing missing is an increase from 12.0 to 12.3 ground realistic, this would have further decompressed top tier. It is also good that more than 3000 comments have been passed on to the developers.

1 Like

Still very disappointed we didn’t use all the available top tier BR’s. Air goes up to 13.3 and there’s players currently taking advantage of this in Ground RB. They add these air vehicles to their ground lineups and ensure they’re always getting a 1.0 downtier.

So a ground only player could be playing in their 11.7 M1A2 SEP V2 and think they got an 11.7 only battle. However in reality they’re in a 12.7 match with players bringing in higher BR aircraft which means they’re at an absolute disadvantage because there’s nothing they can do about that.

You could easily shift several BR’s of top tier ground vehicles up to 13.0 and keep 13.3 for future additions. Which takes pressure off more upper mid tier vehicles.

3 Likes

I will only speak for brits and german realistic ground rb.
9.3 is ok. Missing item spaa for both.
10.3 ruled by one leavers, germany got some nice selection of paper tanks, got lucky owning pt16/14 and now boxer mgs.
Brits TTD with giant flat forhead, challenger mk2 too slow in everything, uptiered you fight things that are land battleships shooting tungsten shell shoot from orbit, while you shoot toothpick.
Spaa for both is below average?

And ehmm, german players i dont know, their awareness of surroundings dosent exist, i think most of them dont know about existence of a minimap, they love blocking your shoots and drive in front alot, some even play without sound, even when they hold perfect line on every flank its still full of holes.
You can scout/point with micro drone enemy tank 20m from them they still wont see it.
Kinda joke but kinda truth sorry boys.

Going back to one leavers at 10.3, today i decided i will join you.
Everything is my own opinion, pls dont eat me.

1 Like

Y’all seriously messed up 9.3 q5 early can’t do nothing against a10 now I see 10.0 + with no flares and the same speed as a f11 at 9.0

1 Like

Here we now hit the issue why the whole bracket got compressed in the first place.

Mig19 used to be 10.0

Then the su25, and a10 drove them all down f104, mig19, arrietes.

The issue is we need again, more decompression for example, the f5c going back down to 10.7 was a ridiculous idea.

4 Likes

The challanger 1 tanks are some of the best from the british line and id rather the challanger mk3 over an abrams, leo2a4, t80B etc.

What youre saying is just wrong, the 2a4 at 10.3 was absolutely one of the best especially in a downtier it was untouchable, same for the leo2k.

We need, more decompression, we need stuff to keep moving up, so they end in their own brackets.

1 Like

Among the blind the one eyed is king

2 Likes

Theyre genuinely great at their BRs great round, great reload, workable armour, decent but not the best mobility especially on rough terraine good turret traverse, gun traverse and the mk3 has gen 2 themrals ? Cant remember if its gen 2 or not.

Theyre pretty good tanks cause they pack a hell of a punch.

But the leo2a4 is better than it.

Challanger 2s now that the ariettes, and merkava got a reload buff is significantly worse than both, armours useless, worse round, worse reload, worse mobility and is bigger than both.

sadly my 11.0 br usa is gone now 11.3 br always uptier to 12.0 br thanks snail

It’s funny how the m1a1 and ipm1 equipped with 1st gen thermal sights and joke armor in 11.3 version go up against vehicles with 3rd gen thermal imaging systems that have much better armor.

Yeah but the m1a1 hc got a top tier round on an 11.7 now can see challanger 1s, leo2a4s etc.

Or the clickbait

It would be nice to have an update that didnt introduce new vehicles but actually polish off what we have…

RB, T-62: 8.7 down to 8.3. Poor mobility and turret turning speed. No range finder. Lack of powerful ammo comparing with nato vehicles in 8.7 which are usually equipped with dm23 or similar shells. No heavy machine guns comparing with other MBTs in USSR tech tree. Its performance is much closer to that of the T55A in 8.3 rather than OBJ-435 and T55AMD in 8.7.

1 Like

A-129 Prototipo has no flairs, has to be an error that it gets moved to 11.0