everything he listed 1.0 BR lower
2 Likes
theyre all a full BR step bellow bar the 2k, and a1a1, which are 9.3 and 9.7, now 10.0 for the 2k
the a1a1L44 sits at 9.3 its 2.4 lower than teh 2pl
Well I’ll be damned. An update. But even still. Imagine how many billions (and it has to be billions at this point, after so many years) of RP have been robbed from players?
3 Likes
Brother…
WHAT.
I cannot take what you have said seriously since you are running that lineup… Not being mean but like what
well i got the 2pl, wanted to use it cause i ground it for years, and use the 10.7s (old 10.3s) with it so i have a lineup? whats the issue
i do more than fine with it
Do you have like the 2A7/6/PSO/5?
yah man just not used em yet xD
So how are you commenting on how the PL plays at the very top…When you haven’t played the tanks I am referring to…?
true 11.7 lineup
2 Likes
cause i know how the PL plays, ive got top tier in 5 nations man, i can tell you teh PL is better than half of those nations top tiers
my US is at top tier just need to buy the sep
1 Like
😐
lmao okay.
1 Like
leo2PL is better than every challanger 2.
the 2PL is better than most of the abrams bar maybe the full top tier ones.
the 2PL is better than any of the 11.3/ now 11.7s for russia, the thing is a monster man i dunno why you want it to get the DM53 round, that it didnt use?
Again, this is TOP TOP TIER performance of the PL.
DO NOT compare it to lower tier MBTs.
Compare to T90M, SEPv2, and other 12.0 (SINCE this is what they are putting it at and what it will be facing, despite the 11.7 rating.)
Since they moved it up, and changed nothing about it, it is STILL underperforming against the 2A7/PSO/6/5 and there is 0 reason or reward to take it over those mentioned in the lineup.That’s why it should get the better round.
I would know since this was the FIRST squadron vehicle I went for and used it very much.
im comparing it with its own BRd tanks, or the 12.0 challangers, hell id say its better than the top tier abrams.
is it really better than abrams? cuz the optic weakspot is massive
That would be the incorrect comparison.
Must compare it to what it will face on a normal basis and other tanks you could use OVER it. Your view is skewed since you brought up your other vehicles to play with it, as there is no 11.7 for Germany (the exact same as when the VJTF/Vilkas was introduced). (Believe it was 10.7, and it was the ONLY vehicle at that rating. so you have to play HIGHER rating.)
yeah id say so, teh abrams is taller with all teh funk on the roof, it also has the massive breach weakspot as well, the turret ring, the hull being paper mache and the same mobility.
same thermals, and marginally better round in comparison
yeah right, you keep changing the goalposts big man.
the loepard 2PL is better still than leclercs, challanger 2s, the type ten may have the reload but its paper and massive so id still take the 2pl
it also doesnt change the fact, im comparing the leopard 2PL to 12.0! not 11.7s now since you asked me to in the last comment and still nto good enough.
it doesnt need to be able to shoot through the UFP of a t80, or am abrams, they have weakspots. its highly mobile. skill issue after checking your damn stat card man, youve got literally germany at top tier, that is it, youve not used any other top tier at all. so yeah cope.