I hope it’s moved by mistake, especially since Lynxes and T129 stay at 10.7.
1 Like
Because it has a slower reload, worse turret armor, lacks turret spall liners, any mantlet penetrations lead to ammo detonation kills and doesn’t have any better mobility.
Just higher pen wouldn’t warrant anything, it’s currently one of the worst Challengers. It should get a 5 second reload and be put along with the rest of the tanks of its family.
8 Likes
there are aside from the russian and chinese tree no valid 10.3 decks i have seen
How is it “decompression” for Top Tier, when most 11.7s are now 12.0, most 11.3s are now 11.7, and most 11.0s are now 11.3?
Arietes are still 0.3 BRs away from Leopard 2A7s and Strv 122s.
The gap in capabilities between the best 12.0s and the worst 12.0s is still large enough that it would warrant a good 0.7-1.0 BR step.
Let alone between most 11.7s compared to many 12.0s.
They just moved almost everything up by 0.3, having zero impact oh these BRs. Nothing changed for 10.7+.
This mere 0.3 “decompression” only affected the 9.0 range. Top Tier is unchanged and as compressed as ever.
9 Likes
8 battles played in 9.3 after the changes a 8 full uptiers. Is the same stupid thing. The real problem is the the terrible and outdated ±1.0 BR spread.
So Mario kart with tanks mode continues unplayable ???
Somehow you Gaijin keep ingorning this one
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/oH2uJg6RleKg
3 Likes
time for 7.0 b29
Yeah, barely anything at all changed.
We’ve been needing 2-3 BRs worth of decompression for such a long time… and 0.3 is the best they could do, apparently.
The more significant changes to note are Merkava and Ariete’s new rates of fire.
2 Likes
Is simple, with (1.0) of BR spread any kind of real decompression is impossible.
2 Likes
Although the changes might be “small” compared to the compression that you guys expect we are still going in the right direction. Smaller changes are more effective at identifying potential issues that come with it.
1 Like
Are you kidding me??? we have the same balance problems since YEARS AGO!!! . This is the third “big BR change” and we have exactly the same problems. How many time need Gaijin for see the (1.0) BR spread is completely unfair in practially every rank ???
10 Likes
A step in the right direction to be sure… however, it just feels insufficient when compression issues have been plaguing the game for months, and even years.
Naval, for example, wasn’t touched at all; the very first Dreadnoughts ever built are still not even a full BR apart from some of the finest Capital Ships ever built. The gap even among many 7.0s is still huge… 5.7-6.0 Cruisers having to deal with these Battleships remains an enormous issue…
And same goes for Ground Top Tier.
The gap in technical capabilities among many 12.0s is still enormous, and even bigger in the case of many 11.7s which are just 0.3 BRs below… and nothing changed in the former 10.7-11.7 range, since all of them just moved 0.3 BRs up, so their relative position to each other remains the same.
1984 IPM1s with a 105mm gun and the very first western composite package to be designed is still out there facing state-of-the-art 2020s MBTs, just at a 0.7 BR difference.
This would be the definition of “too little, too late”. The dissatisfaction is being so loud here because many of us waited for months for a BR update in hopes that the game’s compression would finally be fixed… but it wasn’t, not by a long shot.
17 Likes
Now TKX (P) Type90 and 90(B) need a better dart.
Idk why they havent listen to the 3+ comments under the first blog saying the same .-.
I do understand your concern, but again, we are moving in the right direction and extreme negativity with this “doom-like” mentality just isn’t it. I personally would see it as a positive instead of a negative. This doesn’t mean that “negative” views towards the changes aren’t accepted, criticism is good when we are constructive and avoid massive rants in it.
2 Likes
Gaijin: ask for feedback
in the end: doesn’t give a F anyway.
9 Likes
Why the hell did you think moving the Merkava Mk.4B and Merkava Mk.4B LIC from 11.3 > 12.0 was a good idea? This is far from bring on par with all the other 12.0 vehicles in its current state, please revise this absolutely abysmal decision. Do better gaijin…
2 Likes
I just would like to see a properly polished and adecuately balanced War Thunder before I die… and sometimes I feel like I won’t get to see it, at the extremely slow pace it ever receives such needed improvements…
Many of us can see so many of the issues so crystal clear, and even provide the perefctly suited solutions… so it’s very frustrating to see it all thrown off the window for no reason.
8 Likes
This is simply not true.
Be positive my friend, In my PERSONAL view i do expect them to manage it.
1 Like