Still very disappointed we didn’t use all the available top tier BR’s. Air goes up to 13.3 and there’s players currently taking advantage of this in Ground RB. They add these air vehicles to their ground lineups and ensure they’re always getting a 1.0 downtier.
So a ground only player could be playing in their 11.7 M1A2 SEP V2 and think they got an 11.7 only battle. However in reality they’re in a 12.7 match with players bringing in higher BR aircraft which means they’re at an absolute disadvantage because there’s nothing they can do about that.
You could easily shift several BR’s of top tier ground vehicles up to 13.0 and keep 13.3 for future additions. Which takes pressure off more upper mid tier vehicles.
I will only speak for brits and german realistic ground rb.
9.3 is ok. Missing item spaa for both.
10.3 ruled by one leavers, germany got some nice selection of paper tanks, got lucky owning pt16/14 and now boxer mgs.
Brits TTD with giant flat forhead, challenger mk2 too slow in everything, uptiered you fight things that are land battleships shooting tungsten shell shoot from orbit, while you shoot toothpick.
Spaa for both is below average?
And ehmm, german players i dont know, their awareness of surroundings dosent exist, i think most of them dont know about existence of a minimap, they love blocking your shoots and drive in front alot, some even play without sound, even when they hold perfect line on every flank its still full of holes.
You can scout/point with micro drone enemy tank 20m from them they still wont see it.
Kinda joke but kinda truth sorry boys.
Going back to one leavers at 10.3, today i decided i will join you.
Everything is my own opinion, pls dont eat me.
Theyre genuinely great at their BRs great round, great reload, workable armour, decent but not the best mobility especially on rough terraine good turret traverse, gun traverse and the mk3 has gen 2 themrals ? Cant remember if its gen 2 or not.
Theyre pretty good tanks cause they pack a hell of a punch.
But the leo2a4 is better than it.
Challanger 2s now that the ariettes, and merkava got a reload buff is significantly worse than both, armours useless, worse round, worse reload, worse mobility and is bigger than both.
It’s funny how the m1a1 and ipm1 equipped with 1st gen thermal sights and joke armor in 11.3 version go up against vehicles with 3rd gen thermal imaging systems that have much better armor.
RB, T-62: 8.7 down to 8.3. Poor mobility and turret turning speed. No range finder. Lack of powerful ammo comparing with nato vehicles in 8.7 which are usually equipped with dm23 or similar shells. No heavy machine guns comparing with other MBTs in USSR tech tree. Its performance is much closer to that of the T55A in 8.3 rather than OBJ-435 and T55AMD in 8.7.
Well, I can say the same thing for the AH-64DJP because it’s like an AH-64A but with the AGM-114K. It doesn’t even have MAW, so I know your pain. If they moved it to 11.3, okay then, but to 11.7, really??
Can someone explain to me why the challenger 3 is 11.7 while the Ariete AMV is 12.0?
the AMV have No armor or survivability, far less spall liners. Subpar mobility and a slightly inferior fire power. AMV is litteraly a 10.3 tank with a better shell