Be positive my friend, In my PERSONAL view i do expect them to manage it.
1 Like
prove it then, what changed (outside the 2-3 changes reverted)?. I didn’t see any new changes, despite having a lot proposed by the community.
7 Likes
No they haven’t. The Mk.4B and Mk.4B LIC were always a step below it, and should remain as such.
Changes, no matter what, take time. And as Stona pointed out previously in the post that the posts were passed to the dev team.
The AIM-120 was tested on an experimental F-14A, but it was not fully integrated. The F-14B never had them. The F-14D however was fully compatible with AIM-120 and was intended to use them but sadly due to budget cuts none were ordered or mounted on it in service.
When/if it comes to the game I nonetheless support the D getting AIM-120
2 Likes
But… when?
I’ve been criticising balance issues and suggesting solutions for them for 8 years, ever since I was just a teenager on High School, and now I’m 25, head of household in charge of financial responsibilities, taking care of my sick mother and about to finish school and get a real job… and the exact same balance and compression issues persist, to the exact same degree.
That’s why I grow more and more frustrated every time.
I can already picture the game still having the same balance and compression problems when I’m 40 as it did back when I was a teenager (if the game remains online by then, which I hope).
All I want is to arrive home from a long day and be able to have a fully enjoyable quality time on my favourite piece of entertainment instead having to be all day frustrated because of long-overdue unaddressed issues.
I just want War Thunder to reach its true potential and become the game it could be if it weren’t for these enormous issues that have been dragging it down all these years.
22 Likes
Is true.
Over 5K positives votes demanding bring back the old 0.7 BR spread was completely ignored and the topic closed.
Gaijin continues destroying maps despite the massive negative review by the community.
The complete silence about CAS problem.
And much much more.
9 Likes
For obscure vehicles maybe. Through official statements from moderators we have learned that several of the most popular suggestions were considered but promptly denied due to conflicting with internal statistics. As you might have seen, many players take exception to this approach and are disappointed that vehicle characteristics is disregarded in favor of stats that are heavily influenced by player skill
2 Likes
People might be willing to cut Gaijin some slack if it didn’t seem like all of their decisions are based solely on making money.
Lots of people have been asking for the 2S38 to go up in BR since its implementation. It only ever moves when other vehicles are also being moved(nullifying the effects of the increase)
Gaijing could easily help with the obvious areas of frustration by sharing some of their data that would help explain why they don’t act on repeatedly requested changes… But they don’t.
So we have a premium that seems under tiered to a lot of players and Gaijin won’t explain why they refuse to move it.
What conclusion do you imagine people draw from this?
9 Likes
I cannot give you an answer to this.
Right now Russian have probably the most powerfull lineup of 10.3 (3 T-72, 2S38, BMP-2M, etc)
But of course no russian bias here…
5 Likes
Just like 13.0BR Flankers and 11.0BR MiG-21bis or 11.7BR J-8B in SBEC?
It is really questionable that we are going to “right direction”.
I mean, if you focused to Jet games, compression is being worse from last BR changes.
3 Likes
China 9.0 is even sexier now that the PTZ-89 has joined the ranks. AFT09/PTZ89 combo is back, baby.
1 Like
Not to mention they left strela at 10.3 RB
6 Likes
Only because the former previous top 10.3 line-up (Britain 10.3) has gone to 10.7.
1 Like
Well, many other changes might be controversial, but it’s nice that the Finnish KV-1 M1942 went down to 4.7 without any fuss or issue - I kept getting lucky and doing alright with it at 5.0, but I think it’s much better-placed with the normal KV-1 ZiS-5, even if the turret armour is slightly better.
That is something never change with the years and is how Gaijin forget move up most of the russian tanks. Well now we need wait another 5 or 10 moths.
2 Likes
Actually, if it was Russian bias time they’d have left the BMD4 at 9.0. For some reason they left 279 and BMP3 at 9.0, and sent theBMD4 up. RIP my event grind lineup of 279/BMP3/BMD4. Edit: No, i take this back. 279 doesn’t have to be put on teams of premium players in Turms anymore, wooh wooh. 279-bias time.
A Mistake was made with the Q-5 Early and Q-5A. They were only supposed to go up in BR for Air RB but they went up for Ground RB.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/cWFTWklrRDKr
3 Likes
