I thought finland only bought 1 ZSU? My fin is a bit lacking so documents are not the strong point of my reading without them being translated fully or having my friend help with the translating.
Bought and used 12 for many years if i remember correctly.
Hello
The HE-VT ammunition was unhistorical and incorrect for the VEAK. We are working to correct its ammunition, based on reports such as this one: Community Bug Reporting System
Other reports show its shell (slsgr m/484) perhaps should not have had a VT fuse in the first place.
As well as the historical aspect, Sweden also did not have a suitable SPAA for 7.7/8.0 lineups and with the removal of its incorrect shell and a change of BR, it suits the new position ideally.
3 Likes
They should but unless Gaijin gets on their hind horses and adds baked vehicle lights that have blackout lights. Chances are they won’t.
2 Likes
If they were more appealing, or just more fun, I’m sure more people would play them. Didn’t like them at all, personally.
1 Like
there is almost nothing in the linked report that is correct…
i’m comparing the stated information with the official AMKAT 1960 (a list of currently in active service ammunition) from the Swedish defence force and the projectile data there.
it is true that the slsgr m/484 is NOT a VT fused shell.
i reccomend this thread:
we have found A LOT of info so far, perhaps not enough to bring back the VT shell for VEAK yet, but its VERY close.
Why not introduce the Finnish prototype ZSU-57-2M instead?
2 Likes
Reason for the Type 81 C moving to 11.3 plz Others as well as I would love to know…
1 Like
Yeah, I don’t know what Gaijin was doing here. Absolutely stupid decision to move them up and put them against 7.0 vehicles. Every change solidifies the idea that there’s just no way the developers play their own game.
2 Likes
That would’ve been a great addition, and a much better idea than changing the VEAK. Sadly Gaijin gonna gaijin.
to be fair though, the sources we do currently have does not mention the VEAK having VT fuses.
It suits the new position ideally despite now losing the only worthwhile SPAA they had, non-proxy SPAA is a joke and radar guidance atrocious.
Anything to protect CAS from being stopped, right?
VEAK
ItPsV
2 Likes
So why is the French Roland 1 9.7 but why is Germany and the US still 10.3. They literally the exact same turret on a different chassis. Only difference is the French one has IRST built into the gunner optic to where the US and German one have a massive radar dish attached to the front of the turret.
Why has NVD been removed from a vehicle that historically had them. Fox is often required at higher BRs, including at night-battle BRs
3 Likes
only the modification, not the actual NVD as i understand it.
That was my thought, but according to others, NVD has been disabled
1 Like
How does removing NV from Fox or similar vehicles benefit the game? Will ASU-85 lose its NV? Will M551 Sheridan?
This seems to be a very arbitrary change, and counter to the realism of the game. Very concerned that the historicity and realism that built WT is slowly being disregarded.
4 Likes
oh… that would suck if that is the case…
yeah, I assumed it was jsut getting rid of a kinda unncessary thing to grind for these tanks. But out right removing them… is a very strange and concerning choice
2 Likes
Do we get our SL back if we bought the NVD mod???
French Roland is unable to elevate past 35° as it lacks a supporting radar tracker.