its mid at best
nooooo but the turretring mann, think about the LFP that “onetaps 90% of the time” on the Abrams, noo.
1 Like
This is extremely obvious with every reply you have made in this thread.
4 Likes
And when exactly in history have I advocated not to have historical fixes applied to said MBTs? I literally am one of the community members who has made most noise about many of these issues and tanks that need fixes and improvements. Would you like me to link here some of the several hundred posts I have made in regards to the Merkavas, the Challengers or the Leclercs over the years?
“Ah, yes, the 8-nation player is actually heavily biased towards a nation they haven’t played in months because they were focusing on multiple other nations. The epitome of an one-sided biased main, indeed.”
Like… dude. You ONLY play China. If there’s a single nation main or biased user here, it’s not me.
Please make noise about this SpanishAvenger senpai : Community Bug Reporting System
TL;DR : Abrams get 5 seconds reload while a bug report with 10 sources and 2 videos was denied for the Leclerc
1 Like
I will! <3
I will superimpose video footage with a screenshot of the issue and then link the issue to the comments so that as many users as possible can hit the “I have the same issue!” button.
EDIT: I just read the developers’ response… that will make things a bit difficult.
Don’t forget the iconic red & yellow font 🥰
is there any buffs coming for LOSAT ?
sorry for spamming a lot about the tank but the tank is really hard to play and not good and it’s missing a lot of system that it have in irl.
Ever since I started recovering my vision, I realised how… bright the colours I used to use till a few months ago were xD
I used to use those bright colours because they were Paint. Net’s default ones and they genuinely seemed fine to my back then altered vision (untreated hypothyroidism dulled my perception of colours)… but ever since I started perceiving colours properly after some months of treatment, I was like- damn, they indeed were quite bright/vibrant before lmao, hence why I started adjusting saturation relatively recently. My eyes just didn’t physically perceive the older colours as vibrant as now I can see they were lol
3 Likes
And when exactly in history have I advocated not to have historical fixes applied to said MBTs?
You do not need to oppose historical fixes to top MBTs to be an enemy
to balance. The fix of one is at the cost of everything else; this becomes an issue when changes are applied with unequal timing, especially when these changes further upset balance instead of aiding it.
People do not need to play every nation to have an informed and largely unbiased opinion. Similarly, you can have hundreds of hours in every nation and still have a heavily biased opinion, having heavy confirmation bias. Personal bias is not shown in your experience, but the opinions you express. To develop an argument on the denial of that (also using an ad hominem attack) only shows you yourself are illogical and prone to bias.
1 Like
nah its just dogshit and a lost cause dont worry
Why exactly would I be biased towards a single nation and its MBTs when I possess and enjoy the MBTs of 8 nations? What reason could I possibly have to have any kind of bias towards U.S or the Abrams tanks?
I just don’t want any nation to be kept beneath any others, and yes, that includes the U.S too .
Then again, I am often also accused of being biased towards Germany, Russia, U.K, and, well, pretty much every single nation.
Every time I advocate for a nation, I get accused of being biased towards it. Because ACTUALLY BIASED people can’t see that I have no interest on being biased towards any nation.
Because let me tell you; bias is not just something you can have towards a nation, but also, AGAINST a nation, which is all I am seeing on this thread.
I just don’t want any nation to be kept beneath any others, and yes, that includes the U.S too .
yeh, and after the Abrams buff the US has the best ground and cas, good one.
And again with the “best tanks” thing… for God’s sake…
Are you really telling me the glass-made Abrams are better than a lineup of Strv 122s, Leopard 2A7V or T-80BVM because… it reloads a tad faster now?
Of course now it’s better than before, but I would say you are greatly exaggerating by suggesting that this rate of fire increase has turned the Abrams tanks into “the best ingame”.
Oh god, this is still going? Hours have passed… You guys need to chill out ;)
it seems to be only a bit better then the challengers due its mobility and a bit more armoured now with the same reload its a mid tank at best
I just realised I have been wasting my time for… FIVE HOURS!!! I just checked, Jesus…
All in futile and vain attempts at reasoning something as obvious as to why the Abrams tanks are not the best MBTs in the game and why the rate of fire increase isn’t “breaking balance”. No wonder I was starting to become sharper/harsher and more bitter, my patience is on the verge of blowing up lmao.
I’ll just leave this thread I guess.
1 Like
Take your time :)
1 Like
yes, I am saying that a 5+ mbt lineup of very mobile, best firepower, good enough protection mbt’s are better than a lineup of mbt’s that you just outperform in every metric except one.
not to ignore the fact that germany and russia have 1 top notch mbt b4 it drops off a lot. Yes sweden still has 3 122’s, and they will still be in close 2nd but an abrams is just notably more mobile with way better firepower as well.
(you also still have the best cas in the game)
