You are wrong, because the CR3TD have worse reload outright, the CR2’s have worse reload after 4 rounds
even before the improvement the SEP was a top 3 mbt, (ofc if you folder the 122’s together).
unless you are bad and cannot play to the strengths to the SEP you might disagree… which… yeh.
2 Likes
I would, if they decide to accept my bug reports, but apparently since France is winning too much they don’t want to.
2 Likes
Yeah. Now that it is confirmed that the smoothbore 120mm guns can get 5 second reloads ingame, CR3TD should definitely get it too, even more so since Abrams already has as well.
In terms of the CR2s, the back ammoracks should be considered 1st stage too, I have no idea why it isn’t the case.
…which is why I once came up with this plan! Sadly, no one tried to follow it, so there was no success xD
3 Likes
As of right now, the leclercs are not bad man. They aren’t the best for sure, but they 100% work. They are still incredibly mobile, and still have a great reload + round. Now with the gun handling buffs it feels incredibly snappy too. Maybe if you stopped coping on reddit/forums for 25 hours a day you could focus more on how to improve!
Wonder why a lot of good players like playing Leclercs if they are so bad hmmm
What strengths!? It was literally the epitome of “average” at best before. Now it got above average reload and everyone is losing their minds over that?
1 Like
Any tank can “100% work” if you put enough effort.
It doesn’t mean that it can be objectively even remotely comparable to the actual best tanks by comparison.
Tanks must be compared counting two players having the same skill levels. Otherwise, you are not comparing the tanks, but the players; and that is not how balance should be done.
1 Like
I’ve seen m22 butcher leclercs frontally
Above average mobility, best overall firepower package, good enough turret still to bounce shots that arent in ur breach (effectively the same as a leo straight on)… just nothing on it was actually bad overall
1 Like
I think people are just starting to understand what a monster the Abrams is when it’s modeled even close to correctly, with proper armor, reduced armor spalling from structural liners, m829a3, volumetric turret ring, it is basically immune from anything frontally at its BR minus a now iffy low spall mantelet, and the gun breach. That plus the best gun depression and elevation, best low rpm torque, and now a buffed reload would just make it insane. Maybe throw in the autotrack on the CROWS for shits and giggles
2 Likes
brainrot on a different level tonight
Best overall firepower…?
It’s got essentially DM43 and a 6 second reload.
If it had either SHARD or a 5 second reload I would agree, let alone if it had both things; but as of now…
I mean, how can you say it has the “best firepower overall” when the Type 10s are rolling around with 4 second reloads and significantly better shells? Now even the Abrams has a better reload with an also better shell.
it also gets to ignore all its real life tradeoffs like heinous weight issues and low mileage, like good compromise (joking) add everything I described but also make it always get stuck in mud, rivers, loose sand, etc lmao
Hahahah.
It’s kinda funny how many people think Abrams is a mediocre MBT in real life because of its extremely poor and castrated state in War Thunder.
If they start making it perform the way it should, they will begin seeing what happens when the nation with biggest military budget and army on the planet makes a tank…
This happens to other tanks, too. Challenger 2s, which just got a quite important mobility fix and which still need armor corrections, the Leclercs with their underperforming armor and firepower, etc.
we were talking about the SEP here buddy
1 Like
I mixed conversations lmao
Thought you were talking about Leclerc there, since someone else mentioned it and its firepower earlier.
See? I just want EVERY, ESCH AND EVERY SINGLE tank of each and every single nation to be depicted on its full glory and without artificial nerfs!
So no, I don’t think two wrongs make a right; and no, I don’t frown upon X tank being improved because Y tank got it worse and didn’t get an improvement yet.
Every time a tank is further corrected, I am happy for it. I don’t understand how anyone can be mad and bitter because “X tank got it worse” or whatever.
fr I hate the “but what about” like yeah that too! Realistic modeling for every nation, but right now we are so close on this one issue that has plagued a major vehicle for years we are hoping it can open the door for more armor remodeling for Chally’s, Leclerc’s, Leopards, Type 10, Ariete, etc
1 Like
Ok cool but you didnt actually reply to anything I said? I would like to see leclercs get improved ofc, but that wasnt what was on hand.
The SEP was still one of the best mbt’s in the game and really didnt need the reload buff. It is now just arguably the #1 mbt at the game with the 122’s in 2nd, some gap to the 2a7v and then a large space where nothing is until BVM