Uneven matckmaking

Well… if you haven tried it - you don’t know if it works :-) until then, we are just guessing :-) … Give it a try for a small group and see how it works ?

Then why not try squading… That’d be easier.

Basically I agree but then you have to make some events for joining squads … then we will start playing squads … I’m sure. :-)

The issue with Squads is, that it takes time to sample a group and often you have to wait for a long time before everybody is there… and then we just starts a AB battle instead… it’s easier and more convenient.

Then why not make some pre-BR level squads with some numbers for, how many you have in the queue … and then we can subscribe for those squad BR levels in which we prefer to fight ?

Why? You can make a chat room and call for people to join you… No event needed…

Nothing stopping you now…

I know you don’t read things, but it’s funny that you come into the helpdesk channel and flytip on the regular about your issues, but I’m sure you don’t understand what that channel is…

It’s players helping players, and the advice in there is often the best advice if you actually take it on board rather than ignoring it in order to keep the complaint going…

Absolute nonsense…

And that is your erroneous choice… There is no actual fixing of that…

Totally your choice to not delay joining by a few minutes to get someone to join…

I seen a 4 man squad clean up a 4.7 AB match in 6 minutes by me being a mere ground pounder while they cleaned up planes and bases.

Then you pick your BRs approriately, and match your own to thiers…

You mean select which fights you pick and choose to play, making unbalanced teams…

Squading fixes a lot of your issues and fixes many of the ‘team’ problems people want to complain about… It’s not that hard.

FlyingDoctor… you can take the “Fairness” out of my suggestion if you like… I don’t care if you name it X, Y or Z :-)… Of course … if you name a group of battles as “Fairness” battles… then the players would think, that all other battles are “not fair” :-)

You were the one who coined the fairness battles then made up the scenario to suit…

It was an afterthought, through and through.

Again, squading is there and it’s your choice not to use it.

1 Like

Honestly, I have tried squading … and found it … taking too much time to sample the group… but I*m pretty sure, that if you rethink the squading thing … and are making some squad events with some fair prices, then we would all move into sqading some how.

You could even combine the squading thing with spending some of the RP points for something. :-)

That’s just your situation, it doesn’t mean to say it can’t be done.

You don’t need an event to do it just actual patience to call on people to join you and a positive mindset to keep the group occupied and ready.

Question … how many players are choosing squading compared to AB mode ?

How much time does it take for you to realise I am just a player…

I am in the helpdesk channel to help players often, because I’m a positive player who guides new players to actually function and not blame the game, or other players for the problems they get fed by other players who are upset with the game…

OK… Sorry … it thought that you was one of the Gaijin employees . sorry

Indeed, but my comments still hold weight, and your choice to not squad is a big part of your issue.

The issue with your suggestion will be the choice to queue which WILL end up with people picking and choosing which fights they take, effectively removing the +/-1.0, extending queue times and making games more unbalanced due to lack of players…

Well, of course we should be able to complaint about the game. I have a life rule which says… don’t complain … if you don’t have suggestion for a solution.

The solution is already there, you choose not to use it.

Go try run a full squad, and I gaurantee you you will find more results.

If you get less battle points playing the “fairness” battles, then I think, that you would get the players to play other modes as well.

This is all hypothetical nonsense and ignoring the point I made…