oh you did too lol… I was in purge mode, so didnt take notice lol
no worries!
oh you did too lol… I was in purge mode, so didnt take notice lol
no worries!
They weren’t a willing member so no plus as I’ve said many times it would be political suicide to put Ukraine in the Russian tech tree.
*USSR also nothing would happen, except a few upset voices.
Pacifica just purged the thread. Lets not go there once again.
This is not a topic for this forum
Ok? What does my comment have to do with anything that’s against forum rules? Is there some sort of unwritten rule for this post specifically?
I’m not going off on some unrelated tangent, I was merely making a simple harmless statement.
Well, it won’t stop all the crazies(it should help with the C&P ones) may I suggest doing something like this:
I had marked all the true C&P in game at the time. (AKA it’s vehicle in-game that didn’t have the nation of the suggestion as the operator nation or was from said nation originally.)
One more?
Cleared already lol
Yeah, i see this. I just can’t even imagine myself in that role, and that’s why I even feel uncomfortable with them replying here
Note: The T-84U Oplot is known as the BM Oplot as well.
Hmmmmmmmmmm
I haven’t seen this photo before
Does anyone have that photo of the Ukrainian T-90A with a zig-zag camouflage? The image has the T-90A in a dugout. Pretty sure it was from 2023.
This one?
Chance of this happening = zero. Now I’m sure of it more than ever.
If you had paid more attention and noticed the recent in-game changes over the past few weeks, you would have already stopped with these ‘Ukraine-goes-to-USSR’ fantasies.
Yes sir, if you have more images of it, I’d appreciate it 🤙
Not sure what this proves, it would be insensitive to show that roundel right now to that audience, anyone could’ve saw this coming.
I truly don’t care how they’re implemented, I just prefer one way over another, and it’ll just add to my collection of vehicles either way. Not because I have any kind of “Biases” I just think it would make more sense from a historical perspective and to keep research lines together rather than separated. I don’t care about politics in my video games, I play them to get away from real world problems, not to embrace them.
Anyways, I’ll stop here, I’m sure I’m starting to bend some rule even posting this. Goodnight everyone ✌️
I’d like to see a skin for the T-90A with this on WTLive. It’s definitely doable since it has no unit markings on it so it wouldn’t impact the “conflict rule” since many skins were taken down because of it. Also need an in-game prop for an energy drink can to match the one in the pic on the turret stowage lol.
It would be “semi-historical” since we don’t have any T-90A with Kontact-1 ERA on the sides.
My next iteration of the tree will match @Merkko’s tree at Rank VI since the Air and Ground tree should match at starting Rank. The likely reserve vehicle will be the T-55A. Doing this will cut down on some C&P as well.
The only thing that would change this is if the Air tree were to be adjusted to come down to Rank V for example.
Osa-AKM-P1 Żądło aka Osa-Р (Polish modification) serving in AFU 1129th Air Defense Missile Regiment
I think it would be cool to add casue it could balance the issue with the ussr stuff.as in where some players say that ussr/russian is to powerful with stuff like the strella the t90M and the t80BVM and a new t80 coming in the next update.My idea is have it where ussr could be pitted against ukriane not in a political way but to balance the eastern block and nato stuff my point being that if your with ussr you’ll thing ight we won or if your fighting against Russia/ussr you think oh god we’re gona loose cause some players do say that Russian/ussr stuff is tough.now i understand that you can take out a t72 or t90 easy but for some it’s rough so if they was to add Ukraine and have it where if you got Germany and ussr the other team would be America and Ukraine as a balance idea thats my idea with how they can go about adding into the game and making Ukraine interesting being a sort of counter to the “Russian bias” you could say