Canadian Leopards should go to the German TT or as german event vehicles. The UK has nothing to do with it and no claims to it whatsoever
All the more reason for a Candian tech tree so we can actually make a lineup of stuff we used and play it. instead of having to play 3-6 trees just to play one thing.
3 Likes
Then just another leopard to the germans as british tanks in game are not as good
Also forgot to add as a possible but not really that practical is the Honest John. Canada Operated many of these in Germany During the cold war however we did not have any Nuclear missile that we would be able to fire, If we needed to fire we had to request Missiles from USA (or possibly Germany) I can’t remember exactly. I’m not 100% sure if Canada had any other missile they had that they fired from them besides training missiles.
They don’t suit the game anyways, so nothing lost by keeping them out.
So I did some Number running for the C&P in this tree.
So there is a total of 141 things here, out of the number there are 26 copy and paste, 18% of this suggestion. Rounding down by things that should be in other trees there are about ~100 unique vehicles give or take.
My unprettyed notes:
"Canada tree copy and paste number
Rank 1
5
Rank 2
9
Rank 3
7
Rank 4
3
Rank 5
0
Rank 6
1
Rank 7
1
Total
26
Number of thing intotal
Rank 1
28
Rank 2
37
Rank 3
18
Rank 4
16
Rank 5
23
Rank 6
14
Rank 7
5
Total
141
Without C&P
115
C&P percentage
18%"
The red stars are something in game already. With the exception of the Canadian vehicles in game.
From what I can see the worst C&P spot is rank II line 3. I’m sure we could do something without just removing the area but I’m not sure.
1 Like
I support this so other nation mains can finally stop arguing about Canadian vehicles
4 Likes
You forgot the ADATS, also its difficult because during WWII a lot of the vehicles used were made by a different country that was part of the allies. There wasn’t much domestic work made however there field mods that Canada did that could spice up 1 or 2 of those vehicles but the majority of them were used as they were manufactured since they did the job.
I forgot to mention I didn’t mark the Canadian ones. I did originally but decided not to after.
As much as people complain about C&P, there is a lot of it in game already and they are adding the same SPH to as many nations as they can in this upcoming update.
I was going to suggest maybe some reshuffling to the area but I looked at the whole rank and it didn’t seem possible.
Yes, this tree has enough vehicles and a rich repertoire. Some people make a fuss about C&P, but its depth, potential, and relationships make Canada a worthy addition to the game.
At least that’s what I think.
2 Likes
Canada can definitely act as a tree.
I have nothing to say about C&P. I think you can add it.
1 Like
i want to see the Canadian vihicles, but im not sure grind so much C&P’s pain can be fixed by the fun in Canadian unique vihicles
Yeah I can see your point, this is again just a basic idea of a tech tree, I included a lot of vehicles people would include as Copy and Paste because I believed more in including all the vehicles that lead up to and/or are currently used by Canada today (including a few additions that do not apply to that).
I wanted to prioritized including them for historical purposes rather then leaving them out for the sake of making everything unique.
I could also look around for modifications and/or check if any special tests were done on any of the vehicles to make them unique but I’m currently working on other suggestions so I’ll post anything if I stumble on anything while researching for those other suggestions.
2 Likes
Thatz, I’m going to need you to explain how this qualifies suggestion and why.
Because to others, this isn’t a valid suggestion(non-mods). and I’d like to know what makes it valid.
Some one doesn’t like Canada
1 Like
They apparently don’t like the Dominion in general and think their current state(put wherever) is best for them.
I’ll tell ya one thing it not a good thing for them to be in this state.
Not here elsewhere. In other threads, they tell me it’s not a valid suggestion.
Luckily most of the people who do look here think it is valid.
1 Like
This is 100% a valid suggestion, I’m not sure what people are saying really, but people have the right to agree or disagree with the suggestion and that is there choice.
Most people just see a few vehicles that are already in game and then say it’s invalid which is incorrect, if they look into the vehicles or look at the suggestions as a whole then I’m sure they would get a better understanding, or even if they asked questions I would be able to hopefully answer for them.
4 Likes
Ohhh you meant rules wise.
I thought you meant that nobody wanted such a tree. My bad!
1 Like