Yep
Waiting for fuji to go to 11.7 where it belongs
1 Like
just had a BR Changelog and nothing happened so you’ll be waiting a long time
there’s already contemporaries at 11.3 with the M1IP/A1 anyway
Not gonna happen unless it gets decompressed.
play aggressively on leo 1…
What could be a bigger mistake?
On sale, yes
You basically get the best japanese tank for 35 euros, don’t even have to grind the TT for it
(yes it’s the best, fight me. it gets more first stage ammo and is at a lower br than the tkx)
Probably talking about the Leo 1A1/1A5’s with stabilizers.
Why not the TKX (P)? It’s the same BR but with a actual good sight and thermals
How did you find the sight btw? That’s honestly the biggest disadvantage for me, I want to buy it even though I already have Type 16 premium, but that tunnel vision sight seems really annoying to play with.
Smaller autoloader, and far far worse armor
Also worse hp/t
sad gaijin basically butchered the type 10, suppose to be quicker then the type 90 but gaijin cant model CVT properly…
I believe they mean the standard MBT line TKX/Type 10. I believe they do it because of worse armor and higher BR, while I haven’t had the experience, the better pen, less armor, more mobility, yet lower ammo ready rack seems worthy of a .7 higher, simply because of survivability, not to mention if it has a spall liner as well.
Who makes the TKX/Type 10 again? I’m surprised Japan, who is notorious for perfecting technology and using what works well for a long period, would field a very bad and unreliable design such as a CVT.
No I mean gaijin just hasnt modeled CVT at all and its for legit every type 10 version
Yes, this is because a CVT has no gearing system, which is a standard for almost every vehicle in game. It’s hard to model an Infinite amount of gears when you driving system is purely gear based.
Eh I guess they could do a workaround and create an invisible set of gears or artificially inflate the RPM to get a similar output of CVT irl
1 Like
You can’t really force a CVT into a gear, it’s hard to explain, but it is auto-mechanical, meaning it automatically moves the driving belt based on throttle input by RPM.
Generally speaking, most, if not all, are gyroscopically operated by shaft RPM.
Essentially this is what I mean by the way it works.
Sight is alright, it does get pesky in CQB, but I have training with 3P snapshotting, so it’s not that big an issue. Still looking for a realistic sighting reticle.