I love how the UFP sucks for no good reason
1 Like
I see your point, but most of the people that like the type 10 have the play style that fit it most.
Looking at the tank overall and in comparison to the rest i’d honestly say the tank is mid to below mid. it’s really sad to me because I love the tank for its ability to excel at everything, but its just not represented like that in game.
1 Like
I agree, but its turret armor can actually tank a hit unlike the type 10 and that’s why I like.
I really hope they fix the era and ufp armor on the oplot tho
1 Like
anyone know when the type 10/tkx engine sound changes?
i don’t hate it, but it’s definitely triggering me since all i can hear is this now
2 Likes
I prefer it over Type 90 and Type 74 those are just so loud and annoying
i’m not saying they are awful, but goddamn it’s triggering me each time the tank revving.
I thought I was the only one who thought the sound was strange.
As its now confirmed that Japan will equip at least one Type 10 with RS6 RCWS and Iron Fist APS for demonstration and testing purposes within the next ~250 days - at least from what can be interpreted so far from Docs - I’ve tried to illustrate how it could potentially look like;
Type 10 (x) v.1:
Will try to get scale and different approaches sooner or later.
21 Likes
taken from the Chally 2 thread.
4 Likes
Excuse me, but you don’t know what happened to the Japanese APS system? It seemed quite advanced.
i think that is still ongoing, this is for demonstrator purposes iirc
Abandoned as it seems.
guh…
Okay, thank you. I still hope that this might lead to something interesting in the future…
Finally putting the basket to use
Tho isn’t that position for the RCWS a bit odd?
Controls would have to go through the autoloader and being that far back all the stuff on top of the turret would be in the danger zone of the gun and block it to engage things in front
What about replacing the 50 cal or behind or next to the gunner’s sights or even replacing the commander’s sight, somewere on top of the turret instead of behind? Also in a place where it doesn’t becomes a blindspot for the APS 🤔
HOLY CRAP A NEW TOPTIER FOR JAPAN IT’S BEEN SINCE THE DINOSAURUS
(without the T-84)
Them selecting Iron Fist is like my dream come true lmao
This is just a first and basic approach with maybe not everything up to scale. However, as I wanted to make near to non major structural changes; the RCWS is mounted on an additional “Box Unit” I added back on the turret (which can only be done on the right side as the Autoloader feed is located on the left and the turret top is mostly covered with blowout panels), the Launchers cover 360° of the tank as off now, but I may try to attach them on dedicated boxes around the turret in a v2.
3 Likes
Type 10 (x) v1.5 - APS is now to scale, RCWS roughly to scale. Changed model as I find it more fitting and it wasn’t already modified by me;
I am kinda unsure how they will manage to get all this stuff crammed on such a small Tank… XD
9 Likes
Now that I think about it, if this goes through, we could get 2 Type 10s with APS, one with the Iron Fist and another with the Mitsubishi APS, since that one counts as an unfinished prototype and was even passed for consideration
So 2 more type 10 variants for the lineup