It’s not hard to hit, but in reality it barely ever gets breach/kills both turret crew/cooks ammo/gets horizontal-vertical, out of any of those scenarios, you never get a single one at all.
WARNING: If you quote your picture to dismiss what i said, you should consider that you aimed the M774 from elevation, and that changes the spalling pattern. Refrain from doing so.
If you don’t hit it with a competitive, top tier round, it’s a wasted shot 80% of the time.
That can’t be said with the Abrams neck, or the pre-2A7 hull, or the suffering minor nations hull.
lol no? You’re adding like 1 1/2 meter when it’s barely taller for CQB conventions?
And this whole driver ports frontal weakspot it’s absolutely besides the point. NATO tanks as a whole are weaker and less protected than Russian tanks to the point even a 10.ish tank can reliably pen their hulls anywhere and achieve pens, the USSR/Russian tanks being the only exception to that.
I get it, you like russian stuff but defending this while moving the goalposts and false equivalences is fairly beyond the convincing side of this conversation.
The breach only takes out the breach and some crew members (1-2).
The breach on the BVM takes out the breach and maybe a crew member.
If you shoot the BVM’s driver’s port, it dies.
If you shoot the Abrams’ driver’s port, it dies.
Anyways, I am not going to continue this argument. I have stated my points, and I don’t feel its worth it to argue with someone that is incapable of playing the Abrams family after over 4500 games in the thing.
Despise something ingame =/= despising it irl. I hated how Gaijin introduced the F-15A, but i tend to like the F-15 series. Actual last comment as you wanted to end in a ‘i never actually liked them despite defending them most of the time’ tone.
Does it beat leos and late abrams in mobility? A friend of mine just tried it out and, through he was disgusted by the track friction, he told me that he was able to be faster
