It could be a premium or squadron vehicle for Germany
Here I have some arguments for the Türkiye Tech Tree. If there is something wrong, then reply to this message and correct me.
- Historical Significance: Turkey has a long military history and has been involved in many important conflicts and wars. Incorporating a Turkish tech tree would expand the game’s historical diversity.
- Unique Vehicles: Turkey has developed a variety of unique military vehicles over the years, including tanks, fighter jets and ships. These could offer an interesting variety to the game.
- New player base: The introduction of a Turkish tech tree could help expand War Thunder’s player base, especially in Turkey and other regions where the game is popular.
- Gameplay Diversity: The variety of nations and technology trees in War Thunder contributes to the game’s tactical and strategic diversity. The introduction of a Turkish tech tree could further increase this diversity.
- Potential Collaboration: Gaijin Entertainment, the developers of War Thunder, occasionally collaborate with various countries to integrate vehicles and equipment into the game. This could be an opportunity for cooperation with Turkey.
1 Like
did you just literally ask an AI
2 Likes
Probably, some sentences seem like they were written with AI but most of the text makes sense and too advanced for a free version of AI.
Not to mention that the whole text makes a lot of sense ngl.
2 Likes
Here is a Video about the Turkish Ground Forces Vehicle. I think there Are 1 or 2 Vehicle which are not avaible in the Tech Tree.
7 Likes
+1 This is a very nice technology tree
7 Likes
Thank you for your contribution efforts, we’ve already included every War Thunder compatible Turkish vehicles in that video.
Thanks in advance, we’re glad you’ve liked our project!
1 Like
The inclusion of a Turkish Armed Forces tech tree in War Thunder could potentially be a lucrative move for Gaijin, significantly boosting their revenue. Beyond the financial aspect, it would also greatly enrich the gaming experience for the community. Türkiye’s vibrant military history and its contemporary role in global military affairs would offer players new and dynamic gameplay opportunities, reflecting the nation’s significant contributions to world defence strategies. The addition would be more than just an expansion; it would be a nod to the prowess and evolution of Türkiye’s military technology, resonating well with War Thunder’s dedication to authenticity and historical accuracy.
5 Likes
I totally agree with you, well said.
I believe that Gaijin now knows the potential of Turkish Armed Forces and Turkish players.
2 Likes
Can you make a own Tree With turkish and Isreal Vehicles and Post it here? I want to See how it would Look like
Nice but should start later like Isreal to spare us the cutnpaste ,we dont need more filler in lower br
I know you worked hard on this, but im going to have to say no. It just feels like a different Israeli tree, which was already a bad decision by Gaijin
1 Like
Your argument about the turkish tech tree can also be used for an ukranian tech tree. Biggest problem about adding new tech trees is that most other countries used vehicles from other countries then started to make their own which would just be immense amounts of copy paste vehicles in the game.
For these trees to be actually fun for the player to grind and not just be grinding the same vehicle they grinded in an another tech tree there has to be like a system where the tech tree with the copy paste vehicles is tied to a tech tree where those tanks are originally from (like if the tech tree has mostly american copy paste vehicles that tech tree should be tied to the american tech tree) and if you had researched and bought the vehicle in the tied tree and that vehicle should be majorly discounted or be already researched .
1 Like
Personally, I find the Ukrainian TT to be significantly more interesting. We currently dont really have that much copying of advanced good soviet vehicles. You could make the Ukr TT a near copy but thatd have to be an effeort to do so. Ukraine has dozens upon dozens of very interesting heavily modified variants of soviet equipment. Especially MBTs, IFVs and SPAAs.
Not to mention ukraine can get the M1A1, Bradley ODS, leo 1/2 with ERA, chally with ERA, etc. Itd be one of the most diverse trees, has some very very cool modified T80s/T55s/T72s and IFVs
Just because Ukr MBTs are based on T64s/72s/80s doesnt mean theyre all the same. The T84 Oplot and T64M for example are practically western inside. Ukraine also has a budget BMPT Terminator with ERA
The only unique vehicles turkey brings are a few SPAAs, some MBT protos, the altay looks like a worse ZTZ/Abrams hybrid. I just think we have enough copy and paste US stuff already. More M60s…weeeeee…
Maybe if the Israeli tree wasnt already in game.
Hence why I think just a combined Middle Eastern tree would be better, considering there are just so many countries that could be added from that
But I also advocate for a V4 tree, not a ukraine standalone tree. Id like a standalone, but im trying to be pragmatic and just giving up that’ll happen. Hence V4
Turkey can absolutely bring unique vehicles and modifications, they have enough to fill low tier and reserve lineups too, can’t say the same for Ukraine, they don’t have a low to mid tier and their air tree is horrific and naval will be nearly non-existent 100% USSR sub tree material.
4 Likes
I’m personally aware of Turkey having the required amount of vehicles to fill lower ranks, but are they actually unique?
I’ve never really looked into Turkish low tier potential since the high tier is absolutely what makes it great, I’d love to find out if it is worthwhile.
5 Likes
turkish low tier wouldnt be really good because it would be like the chinese low tier since turkey couldnt develop tanks during its early existance because it just was out of multiple wars
5 Likes
sss
I don’t think it is Israeli Tech Tree is the problem, I’ve stated same thing a lot, it is they way it is implemented. I don’t necessarily think having a combat proven equipment in game is a bad decision… Much of Israeli equipment saw combat, and I do believe such vehicles should find their way in to the game somehow.
Again, Gaijin could’ve implemented Israeli in a lot better way with proper Infantry Fighting Vehicles, Anti-Air Vehicles and whatnot.
To be honest, it makes perfect sense and I don’t really see much of a problem with it, hell even currently this attic employed by Gaijin. It is fair in my book.
I mean, Israeli equipment saw more action than most of the nation’s vehicles in-game, it is hardly fair to ignore this fact. I’ve stated above, I’ll again, if a military vehicle saw combat in some degree It should be in-game. For, China again, it is the implementation. Chinese arms industry has great portfolio of vehicles probably larger than some nations. Instead of adding those Gaijin adds simple addition which drivers players away from the tree.
Those are not mutually exclusive though, maintaining game is something adding new content is something, both should be actively pursued.
I was answering your comment but apparently it was removed.
What a way to have an opinion, we were about to have nice and civil discussion.
I mean I’ve had exact same discussion with countless people, I’m not gonna have it with you too. Sure there are lacking sides, but the focused top and middle tier absolute do not lacks unique experience but since you have that opinion I’m not going to argue.
Yeah, no. Turkey has absolutely no ties with rest of the Middle East in form of partnership except for Israel and maybe UAE.
This is at Gaijin’s hands, not ours. I would rather slap an M48 which was used and still in-service, than leave it a big gap. I’ve never said there was filler vehicles. There is and there will, those vehicles are bot outweighs unique vehicles and experiences they might bring.
Probably most important aspect, Turkish Tech Tree supports several line-ups with Light Vehicle/Tank- Multiple Main Battle Tanks - Several Competitive Anti-Air Vehicles and Dedicate ATGM Carriers, I don’t really see why and how it lacks vehicles.
So does Turkey. There is vehicles exactly the way you described, heavily modified both western and soviet equipment
So now addition of M1 to other trees is not bloating huh ?
So, a modernised M60 is “more m60s weee” but T-64/72/80 is not. You are kind of contradicting with yourself.
Completely ignoring whole range of wheeled and tracked light platforms, I see.
They have absolutely nothing in common not even visually, you are just being funny.
Again, no. I’ve already explained it above.
Visegrad was actually brilliant project, sadly Gaijin killed it with Hungarian Sub-Tree. Yet Ukraine has no business there, standalone Ukrainian Tech Tree is a lot more feasible.
I’m defiantly not trying to bury Ukrainian (or any other similar projects), in fact I’m actively supporting a standalone Ukrainian Tech Tree especially after all those political stuff. It is your contradicting comments what I’m pointing I’ve always support such projects as much as I can, and still helping whenever and however I can.
I’m not really fan of Tier III and below not gonna lie, we did our best to at least show there is something. Still I very much favor Tier IV and above version as it has the best options.
Let me save you sime time, no. Our lower tiers, specially Tier III and below, is pretty much just copy-paste that being said our focus has been on Tier IV and above and especially top tiers.
Except for few gun truck, there is nothing unique so not really feasible in my opinion. It would only draw away players.
Precisely this, forcing people to play T4 without back-up is not a good idea in my eyes. Tier IV onwards is where the things actually gets exciting.
2 Likes
Unfortunate.
In that case making the tree Israeli styled rank IV+ was definitely the right choice!
1 Like
Lower tier Turkish ranks are identical to Chinese one, getting more unique as it progresses up the ranks.
I believe higher tier Turkish ranks can even compete with the big 3 nations, but there is not much hope for lower ranks. But I don’t think it makes sense to compare it with Israel, since Israel does not even have copy paste vehicles to fill ranks 1-3.
To be honest Israel is not bad, just poorly implemented. They have few unique vehicles that are fun to play, and I see Turkey is similar to that, but with more original and a larger amount of vehicles.
If you have any feedback, we would love to note them.
I haven’t researched the Ukrainian Tree in detail, but what you said also applies to the Turkish Tree. While I would like to discuss the Ukrainian Tree, it is not relevant to this topic. I simply want to express that I am not a fan of adding copy paste Western vehicles (+ those with minor modifications) on Eastern trees.
It appears that you haven’t examined our tree in detail, my friend. I can assure you that Turkish Tree contains more than “few SPAAs, MBT prototypes and more M60s”. I suggest you to check our vehicle suggestion posts, I am pretty sure you can find many vehicles that will fit your liking.
Also, Altay’s specifications on our posts can prove that Altay is on par with other Western MBTs.
1 Like