Troll squads

God Mode was made when the game was far more BR compressed than it is today as well.

And the only change to it was going to 30,000SL from 50,000.

So complaining about it today is… a choice.
Especially as the game gets more and more decompressed over time, even if it’s slow.

You are free to that opinion.

Still really bad as dying drains your team’s tickets and opponents gain SP.
Your chances of ending that spawn in a net positive for your team are extremely small.

Also, players who do that but have whole TT researched is simply inexcusable.

Doesn’t take a genius to figure out you sitting in a goal or spawning a Reserve tier tank in a top tier game isn’t a normal human behavior and is nothing more than a rage bait.

Stock vehicle is forced on you, sitting in the goal as a goalkeeper for the whole match isn’t.

Proving malice is objectively impossible in most cases.

You can usually spade it in PVE. And not bother the team mates with your trash. :-)

I’m still bringing the best vehicle I can at that moment, which is the whole point.

It is not an opinion. This is logical provable fact.

You’re attributing meaning behind an action as if it is fact when there are multiple options for reasons to that action. Conjecture.

Correct, but that has nothing to do with your usage of the word.

Sorry but it isn’t.

Yeah, I’m sitting down in my goal because I like to eat dirt off of my shoes while in an active game of football. I’m definitely not doing it to rage bait people and it’s definitely not “intentionally malicious”.

In my area you’d be very likely to get a kiss on the cheek for that “funni” and totally unintentional turn of events, as everyone would be amazed by your ingenuity to create “funni” mishaps.

Refer to the sentence above.

Then describe to me how going for an achievement will incentivize active malice in a player.

You’re deliberately disturbing/spoiling other players’ enjoyment by going for that achievement.

1 Like

How do you know that is their intention?

Because they actively chosen to not spawn their best available vehicles for that nation/vehicle combination.

If you’re fine with that behavior I’m sure you wouldn’t oppose your teams being made of only God Mode hunters for the rest of your playtime. At the end of the day, they aren’t doing anything wrong, right ?

1 Like

That does not automatically mean intentional malice.

It automatically means deliberate disruption/spoiling of other players’ enjoyment.
Also, there’s a pending question you haven’t answered yet.

1 Like

We are running in circles now.

Will not answer irrelevant questions.

Because they’re going for the achievement ?
And don’t reply with: “How do people know it’s disruptive to bring Reserve tanks to top tier”.

It’s pretty relevant.
Would you get upset if you had nothing but God Mode hunters in your teams for the rest of your playtime ? Would you feel your experience is getting disrupted/spoiled by all those innocent people just hunting a simple achievement.

It’s a simple yes/no question but it’s obvious you’re refusing to answer as you yourself know it wouldn’t suit your agenda.

1 Like

Re-read the description of the word griefing.

They have to do it with the purpose of being disrupting and aggravating, that HAS TO be the goal for the action for it to fall under griefing. It cannot be a biproduct or an unintentional consequence while they aim for something else. By your definition a bad player would be griefing just by being bad at the game.

You’re asking for my personal opinion about a specific in-game situation. it is irrelevant to your incorrect usage of a word during a discussion on the forum.

My answer does not matter to the discussion of your usage of the word “griefing”.

My answer could be yes, my answer could be no. Either way it wouldn’t effect the discussion and would only lead to sidetracks that has nothing to do with the word “griefing” and your usage of it.

My criminal law teachers would like to have word with you on the topic of negligence.

1 Like

And on that topic, doesn’t actual law have different words for things when they are intentional vs when they are not?

It very much can.

No he wouldn’t if he’s trying his hardest to do something with his available skillset and vehicles.
Someone spawning in a Reserve tier tank when he has multiple top tier tanks available is an intentional way to spoil others’ enjoyment. The intention behind it is irrelevant. You could go for the God Mode, you could try to jump over a 2A7V for a “funni” video or do something else entirely.

You did that with intent.

Scared of answering because it wouldn’t really go with your agenda ?
Supporting something but not wanting that to be happening to you is a clear way of knowing you’re in the wrong.

I agree with a BR restriction, and I’ve also said the exact same thing in the past that these biplanes do nothing but shooting the one who brought them into higher BR and dies for 99% of the times.

2 Likes

Not if you want to use the word griefing.

And if someone is trying their hardest with their available skillset and lower BR vehicle to try to get the achievement?

Not if you want to use the word “griefing” .

Again, has nothing to do with it and is irrelevant to the discussion. And no, i’m not answering on principle of sidetracking.

I can be against something and at the same time correct your incorrect word usage to describe that thing. They are not mutually exclusive and thus my opinion is irrelevant to the discussion.

I’m not “scared”. I’m trying to keep the discussion on track.