Still really bad as dying drains your team’s tickets and opponents gain SP.
Your chances of ending that spawn in a net positive for your team are extremely small.
Also, players who do that but have whole TT researched is simply inexcusable.
Doesn’t take a genius to figure out you sitting in a goal or spawning a Reserve tier tank in a top tier game isn’t a normal human behavior and is nothing more than a rage bait.
Stock vehicle is forced on you, sitting in the goal as a goalkeeper for the whole match isn’t.
Proving malice is objectively impossible in most cases.
Yeah, I’m sitting down in my goal because I like to eat dirt off of my shoes while in an active game of football. I’m definitely not doing it to rage bait people and it’s definitely not “intentionally malicious”.
In my area you’d be very likely to get a kiss on the cheek for that “funni” and totally unintentional turn of events, as everyone would be amazed by your ingenuity to create “funni” mishaps.
Because they actively chosen to not spawn their best available vehicles for that nation/vehicle combination.
If you’re fine with that behavior I’m sure you wouldn’t oppose your teams being made of only God Mode hunters for the rest of your playtime. At the end of the day, they aren’t doing anything wrong, right ?
Because they’re going for the achievement ?
And don’t reply with: “How do people know it’s disruptive to bring Reserve tanks to top tier”.
It’s pretty relevant.
Would you get upset if you had nothing but God Mode hunters in your teams for the rest of your playtime ? Would you feel your experience is getting disrupted/spoiled by all those innocent people just hunting a simple achievement.
It’s a simple yes/no question but it’s obvious you’re refusing to answer as you yourself know it wouldn’t suit your agenda.
They have to do it with the purpose of being disrupting and aggravating, that HAS TO be the goal for the action for it to fall under griefing. It cannot be a biproduct or an unintentional consequence while they aim for something else. By your definition a bad player would be griefing just by being bad at the game.
You’re asking for my personal opinion about a specific in-game situation. it is irrelevant to your incorrect usage of a word during a discussion on the forum.
My answer does not matter to the discussion of your usage of the word “griefing”.
My answer could be yes, my answer could be no. Either way it wouldn’t effect the discussion and would only lead to sidetracks that has nothing to do with the word “griefing” and your usage of it.
No he wouldn’t if he’s trying his hardest to do something with his available skillset and vehicles.
Someone spawning in a Reserve tier tank when he has multiple top tier tanks available is an intentional way to spoil others’ enjoyment. The intention behind it is irrelevant. You could go for the God Mode, you could try to jump over a 2A7V for a “funni” video or do something else entirely.
You did that with intent.
Scared of answering because it wouldn’t really go with your agenda ?
Supporting something but not wanting that to be happening to you is a clear way of knowing you’re in the wrong.
I agree with a BR restriction, and I’ve also said the exact same thing in the past that these biplanes do nothing but shooting the one who brought them into higher BR and dies for 99% of the times.
And if someone is trying their hardest with their available skillset and lower BR vehicle to try to get the achievement?
Not if you want to use the word “griefing” .
Again, has nothing to do with it and is irrelevant to the discussion. And no, i’m not answering on principle of sidetracking.
I can be against something and at the same time correct your incorrect word usage to describe that thing. They are not mutually exclusive and thus my opinion is irrelevant to the discussion.
I’m not “scared”. I’m trying to keep the discussion on track.