@白雪
NATO and China are “red team” and “red side” to you?
I don’t want Brimstones, AGM-65s, or KH-38s removed from War Thunder, I just want counters to them to exist and be commonplace.
All 10 tech trees need chaff-smoke for example if radar guided AGMs are added.
I’ll simply reiterate this.
It’s hard.
Especially when they introduce some weird missile instead of Brimstone.
Just add the rocket that is in the title or don’t add it at all.
I repeat, this is not funny.
Just as I wanted to write a spicy comment 😐
It’s not hard to keep the place tidy, and it’s not hard to bring a personal dispute with someone to PM. I simply want this place to be clean, nothing much.
It wasn’t me who wrote the provocative answer.
Rather, I was surprised how “balance” doesn’t work with the X-38MT, after which “my friend” decided to anger me.
I also wonder if the Object 640 “Black Eagle” will lose its ability to fire in the game.
After all, its shells will bring imbalance to the game.
Therefore, you can leave only machine guns that do not spoil the game. 😉
I did not include them because of my main opinion
afaik that’s been changed now, i mentioned it in another thread wrt PGMs being changed from AGMs to bombs and was told that bombs also get detonated by SAMs now.
Apologies.
I have to agree with what someone said earlier; why bother adding this if you’re just going to gimp it before it even gets to the game? Are the devs really that petty against Western vehicles? The Yak-141 gets added to the game with stuff it never had, the KVT gets added with the incorrect variant because god forbid the US has two premium M1A1s while Russia gets two. The 27ER isn’t allowed to have any competition as every request to get an Aim-7 just with a data link was ignored.
Just scrap the aircraft. We can try again later instead of gimping it and making it DOA before it even gets to the game.
As we have answered you before, we do not have anti-radiation missiles or wepaonary in game.
So this plane will be like… 150% useless now?
So maybe… you just add it?🤷♂️
Not at all?
No aircraft in game has anti-radiation weapons.
GR.4 brings dual mode (GPS + Laser) Paveway IVs which offer a lot more flexibility in battle, as well as EGBU-24 and Brimstone SAL.
So nothing new or even nearly peer to counter the main threat of any top tier CAS plane, thank you for the reply
Since your post brought up the Yak-141, your entire post is null and void and can be dismissed.
With that said, Tornado GR4 is not an incomplete prototype. It is not Kikka or Ho-229, it’s a fully production aircraft.
AIM-7 with datalink wouldn’t be functional as buddy-locking isn’t a feature in War Thunder.
Your post also implies Su-34 is DOA by claiming Tornado GR4 is DOA.
Soviets don’t have two 11.7 premiums.
Please tell me the BR is not final. I have a hard time justifying it above 11.7, let alone 12.0. if it is 12.3 it’s DOA (in air)
Especially in sim, where this means it’s permanently fighting 12.7s
Paveway IV is new
EGBU is new
Terma is new
HMS is new
AIM-9M is new for the GR.4
So quite a lot is indeed new :)
I’m not sure why you believed an aircraft with AIM-9M, MAW, more countermeasure options, dual mode Paveways, HMS and other features would be anything less than 12.0 to begin with.
BRs can always change, but this is an entirely logical starting point. It’s a significant upgrade over GR.1.
