In fact, China has never sold any weapons to Japan, nor has Japan ever possessed the VT4
5 Likes
It is a Thai-operated vehicle in major service in Thailand. What of fair Thai representation then? What of the Thai playerbase that wants their own tanks to be represented in the game? Have you ever consulted anybody that is Thai on their opinion?
It is not the Chinese opinion that should matter but the Thais.
1 Like
You overlooked one point: The authorities had attempted to add Chinese tanks to the Japan TT around the anniversary of the Chinese victory over the Japanese invaders. This was regarded as a provocation by Chinese players.
1 Like
To be honest, how many Thai players have spoken up here? We all know that you can’t really hear their opinions at all. Never speak on behalf of others.
2 Likes
Then I must ask: Does assigning the Leopard 2 PL vehicle to Germany respect the opinions of the Polish people?
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Again please refer to this.
3 Likes
And what is the opinion of the Polish people? I dont hear the Polish community having a fit over the Leo 2 PL on the German TT.
All exported weapons are subject to restrictions; it is questionable whether they could ever enter Chinese territory without authorization
This is a reasonable and feasible approach, just like the Leopard 2 tanks in Poland and Canada.
2 Likes
Instead of the VT-4 coming this update I suppose the update after?
Why should the Thais bend over to Chinese opinion on this? Why make it a premium especially when its a major service vehicle? What of the Pakistani version then?
5 Likes
The game official is playing a word game with us
5 Likes
Even if a major tech tree already contains a sub-line for a certain country, it does not mean that all equipment from that country must be included in that tree. For example, the British tech tree has a complete South African sub-line, yet the South African Class 3 (P) is still placed in the German tree. This demonstrates that vehicle allocation can be flexibly adjusted.
Therefore, forcibly adding a highly controversial Chinese-made vehicle to the Japanese tree is neither necessary nor appropriate.
9 Likes
we never accept adding VT-4 to Japan！
6 Likes
Then why should Chinese players follow your advice? It is the developer’s responsibility to avoid conflicts among players. You can’t do nothing but come up with an ideal excuse of your own and keep repeating it, which is just like burying your head in the sand.
6 Likes
Again, this is an opinion held more prevalently on the Chinese community but we are talking about a Thai-operated vehicle.
It should be Thai opinion that matters, not anybody elses. Similarly as to how Ukrainian opinion on their vehicles being represented.
2 Likes
And since the Leo 2 PL was sold by Germany to Poland, I have to ask: Why should it go to Germany instead of Russia?
4 Likes