Topic about Japan adds T-84 and VT-4

Good Points

5 Likes

No VT-4 for the next major update is already confirmed. We need to lay this to rest. There will be no Chinese vehicle entering the Thai subtree in September.

If that is the issue then please relay these to your respective communities. Otherwise, the VT-4 should not be unilaterally disbarred from ever appearing because of political concerns which threaten fair THAI representation.

1 Like

No, we’ve already known this, but for more reference:

1 Like

The Japanese flag really should be the Hinomaru for the international client, that we agree. The Rising Sun flag doesnt really make sense but this is outside the purview of this particular topic.

3 Likes

We never said Japan shouldn’t get the Thai sub-tree — we’re only talking about one specific vehicle in it that involves sensitive issues. The Finnish sub-tree going to Sweden wasn’t timed around dates that trigger historical wounds, nor did it carry any symbolic provocation. The VT-4 news, on the other hand, is being released at a highly sensitive time, which most Chinese players see as a provocation.

Also, Sweden–Russia relations today are nowhere near as long-term tense and highly sensitive as China–Japan relations are. The two cases are not comparable.

And while similar situations might happen in real life, this is a game — it should be actively avoiding such risks, not running headfirst into them.

In any case, the devs can choose whether to add this vehicle, and Chinese players can choose whether to play this game — it depends on whether you still want the Chinese market.

12 Likes

Has Japan ever captured a VT4?

6 Likes

Please refer to this. However future addition shouldnt be disbarred from ever happening. It is a Thai-operated vehicle.

I agree

The VT4 tank, like other Chinese vehicles to be purchased in the future, is merely one of the vehicles procured by the Thai Army. It should rightfully belong to its country of origin, just like Germany’s Leopard 2 PL, rather than being assigned to Japan. Moreover, what justifies sending Chinese-made vehicles to Japan? Simply because Japan has a subsidiary line within the Thai Army?

3 Likes

I think we could use some diagnostic on how the rumor started in the first place, though.

In fact, China has never sold any weapons to Japan, nor has Japan ever possessed the VT4

5 Likes

It is a Thai-operated vehicle in major service in Thailand. What of fair Thai representation then? What of the Thai playerbase that wants their own tanks to be represented in the game? Have you ever consulted anybody that is Thai on their opinion?

It is not the Chinese opinion that should matter but the Thais.

1 Like

You overlooked one point: The authorities had attempted to add Chinese tanks to the Japan TT around the anniversary of the Chinese victory over the Japanese invaders. This was regarded as a provocation by Chinese players.

1 Like

To be honest, how many Thai players have spoken up here? We all know that you can’t really hear their opinions at all. Never speak on behalf of others.

2 Likes

Then I must ask: Does assigning the Leopard 2 PL vehicle to Germany respect the opinions of the Polish people?

3 Likes

Again please refer to this.

THERE IS NO VT-4 FOR THE SEPTEMBER UPDATE.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

Again please refer to this.

3 Likes

And what is the opinion of the Polish people? I dont hear the Polish community having a fit over the Leo 2 PL on the German TT.

Refer to: Topic about Japan adds t84 and vt4 - #602 by UnknownVariable

1 Like