Topic about Japan adds T-84 and VT-4

Like they do with every update…? I’m confused, do you think they announce every vehicle coming months in advance?

1 Like

At first they denied it lol only after backlash did they admit

1 Like

The VT-4 was never coming for this update, it was always delayed (even the leak says this). All they confirmed was that it wasn’t coming this update.

3 Likes

At first they said “no addition”

1 Like

Because they weren’t going to add it this update. They still haven’t fully confirmed it, are you expecting them to announce every vehicle months in advanced when they usually delay things in the weeks leading up? The F-2A was leaked to come an update before it did, but it was delayed.

2 Likes

That said, it would be nice if gaijin was more consistent with Australia and Canada. I for one wouldn’t mind seeing an Australian M1A2 or Canadian leopards or even the ASLAVS in the British tre, but that’s another subject entirely.

Also this was before the subtree system existed.

1 Like

yep it was also mentioned as addition to showcase the similarity of the canada situation with israel back then

Well that never stopped certain people to demand delete something from Sov/Rus tree.

So now it’s not even secondary ?

1 Like

As I said,

It is Thai, first and foremost. It being Thai first means only the Thai have a valid opinion on where their MBT goes. If I give you a pen, then slap you in the face for giving the pen to someone else, is that okay?

Elaborate. Stop being vague.

3 Likes

So you are saying I am trying to trick you and manipulate you? Not a good way to get your point across.

Which is where Thailand sits. It has been a subtree of Japan for like 6 months. Either you stop complaining or call for the whole subtree to be removed.

1 Like

Funny enough Germany has G.91R/3 tested and manufactured by Italy, but nobody is talking about this one not represented in the Italian TT.

Would be nice to see Italian one as well, especially since it would be the best Gina in the tech tree.
Or alternatively they could add a Portuguese R/3 with sidewinders, as a long-awaited squadron vehicle for example.

Why ? As i said there is no problem with Thailand sub tree being in there are problem with VT-4 being in Japan tech tree.

1 Like

Thai VT-4 is perfectly fine in thai subtree that is located within japanese TT.

Its no longer chinese tank. It might still be chinese manufactured but it stopped being chinese when thai bought it and started operating it with thai crews, thai camo and thai rondels.

This was stated a hundred times already in this thread.

What makes this concept so difficult to grasp?

2 Likes

Because it’s cultural appropriation

1 Like

Yeah, chinese community is appropriating thai tank.

That indeed is harmful.

2 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

My friend no need for such harsh words. You need to get your emotions in check.

All im saying is that you are confusing chinese VT-4 and thai VT-4.

Not wanting to add chinese VT-4 to japan due to historical reasons is perfectly legitimate.

But tank is question is thai VT-4.

No you can’t just buy something and cut it’s cultural ties it’s Chinese tank.

1 Like

Im nearly sure my friend that the energy drink im drinking, which i bought, is mine, i own it, and it has no culrural ties to the country of origin.

1 Like