Topic about Japan adds T-84 and VT-4

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
2109

It is a game about vehicles of war. There is no political statement unless players create one.

6 Likes
2110

Every game is always political if you try hard enough

2112

I disagree somewhat. If chinese VT-4 was being added to japan it would indeed be an issue.

but the tank is question isnt chinese VT-4. Its thai.

5 Likes
2113

?
My man whats political about a tank game?
Are you insane?

1 Like
2114

I think Thai players have the right to decide which nation their tech tree and vehicles should belong to.

7 Likes
2116

So Chinese players do not oppose the addition of a Thai tech tree, but rather oppose the addition of a Japanese tech tree.

3 Likes
2117

This topic is about the T84 and VT4 so talking about anything else is off topic,
talking about any historical or present political themes is not allowed and it will be removed without warning and if anyone feels they can start throwing harmful accusations at users or racist comments will also be dealt with and depending on the level even face a perm ban!

4 Likes
2118

If I’m reading it right the issue is the symbology of having the Chinese tank added under the Japanese flag, creating the image of China being still subservient or under control of foreign powers. is that correct? And if so would it still be an issue if the VT-4 was added in a tech tree with Japan, but under an alliance name rather than the Japanese flag, kind of like having the UK and India together, but flagged as β€œCommonwealth”.

2119

I’m sorry but I think that when people do not want a tank because of political reasons, then saying that reason is stupid in game that isn’t political, is valid.
If you still want this to stop then I will.

2120

Japan TT is already in game, so is china TT. Only real question is wherever Thai subTT should be placed, and gaijin decided that is with Japanese TT. Thus, thai VT-4 is free game.

Believe me I would oppose addition of chinese VT-4 to japan all the same, but that simply isnt the case. Thailand bought these VT-4s, they own them. As such, they should follow wherever thai subTT goes.

8 Likes
2122

What I am saying is no political messages at all as it breaches the guidelines: 3.1.6 political and religious agitation and propaganda, including propagation of conflicts; discussion of actual political and religious issues is also prohibited due to the provocative nature: we urge you not to draw comparisons between war-historical themes and any of the political events

2 Likes
2123

So, you said that Thailand cannot use the tank that its own? Then who should we listen to: the people who actually use it, or the people who just sell it and don’t do anything with it? Please do not took away our rights your business just ended after finished sold to us.

Please dismiss

4 Likes
2125

If this is the only problem, then the simplest solution would be to rename the techtree to Thailand. Then it would be Tgailand, only with Japan subtree under Thailand.

It’s the same thing functionally, but would get rid of this issue and allow the Thai VT-4 to be added to the Thai tree

2 Likes
2126

ah yes we hate japan cause of what happened 80 years ago :clap:

also thailand has good relationship with japan so why shouldnt it?

take your nationalist butt to the chinese forums

6 Likes
2128

I wouldnt be surprised they’d complain about that tbh

1 Like
2129

I love the 2nd meme

1 Like
2131

Gold

3 Likes
2132

:) glad to make all ur days with these xD

4 Likes
2133

Won’t stop until we get our Thai VT-4 πŸ«‘πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡­πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡­

1 Like
2134

can stop wont stop

we want rational reasons to oppose why it shouldnt be added. Not political bullcrap noone asked for

6 Likes