it does not look for me that sweden and china needed those two at all tho.
its just a way to please certain playerbase if you ask me
Totally agree
it does not look for me that sweden and china needed those two at all tho.
its just a way to please certain playerbase if you ask me
Totally agree
Chinese MBT literally one of the best Flanker in Toptier like you have speed of NATO vehicle and Low-Profile from Russian MBT look at the MBT-2000/Al-Khalid-I got speed, low-profile, armor is 50/50 also 577mm of flat pen APFSDS | and yes Chinese MBT don’t have that much of protection compare to like T-90M and T-80BVM but you have Firepower and speed so use that instead for flanking not running straight head-on to where enemy expecting you lmao
PRC is missing ROC Abrams.
Japan is missing Thailand VT-4. What’s your point
Did you know that this extra bit of pointless speed can cause STAB to fail?
Have you actually compared the protected area projection of ZTZs and NATO tanks?
Since Sweden has purchased Germany Leopard 2A4(Strv 121) and Leopard 2A5 with improve armor (Strv 122) why aren’t swedeish vehicles assigned to the German tech tree? type question
The cope is real with his idea lol
I know ur Gun Stabilization limit is at like what 70km/h and ur top speed is 75km/h
the anwser? welp try slowing down a bit ur gun STAB now working easy
I play both Chinese TT and Swedish TT i know what im talking about lmao
use ur brain maybe
I wonder if there is even a source for this limit. Seems weird to have a stabilizer that just barely can’t deal with a vehicles top speed.
Maybe it can be bug reported if it’s wrong?
Not a game in top tier… Play the VT4 and tell me that thing is 12.3.
VT-4A1 is 12.7 (FY-4 ERA and APS)
VT-4 is 12.3 (FY-2 ERA and without APS)
Still use the same play style like MBT-2000/Al-Khalid-I
Sneak around using ur top speed and very strong APFSDS that’s it
Only difference is VT-4A1 can block some ATGM using APS and Thats it
Protection? Well if chinese a bit more smart during development this thing they should have like ERA on lfp or maybe extend the composite armor more to the lfp because the lfp is so big that any tank can literally pen it
Kinda curious about that too like STAB Limit at 70km/h? Kinda funny
You genuinely base your sense of vehicle performance irl on a game like warthunder?
Yeah, except 1.0 BR up, and note they have actually slower reverse. (17vs34) Ur top speed is not a ‘strength’ at 12.3/12.7 either, like half the MBTs can get as fast as u, unlike the 99A which can pull away. 12.3/7 is a very different BR placement.
Strong dart…
And plus u can do that with almost any tank. (almost)
They did extend the composite, but welp Gaijin. Plus they for some reason reversed the change where the autoloader and crews are moved up so there is much left unprotected by LFP.