The cope is real with his idea lol
1 Like
I know ur Gun Stabilization limit is at like what 70km/h and ur top speed is 75km/h
the anwser? welp try slowing down a bit ur gun STAB now working easy
I play both Chinese TT and Swedish TT i know what im talking about lmao
use ur brain maybe
1 Like
I wonder if there is even a source for this limit. Seems weird to have a stabilizer that just barely can’t deal with a vehicles top speed.
Maybe it can be bug reported if it’s wrong?
1 Like
Not a game in top tier… Play the VT4 and tell me that thing is 12.3.
4 Likes
VT-4A1 is 12.7 (FY-4 ERA and APS)
VT-4 is 12.3 (FY-2 ERA and without APS)
Still use the same play style like MBT-2000/Al-Khalid-I
Sneak around using ur top speed and very strong APFSDS that’s it
Only difference is VT-4A1 can block some ATGM using APS and Thats it
Protection? Well if chinese a bit more smart during development this thing they should have like ERA on lfp or maybe extend the composite armor more to the lfp because the lfp is so big that any tank can literally pen it
Kinda curious about that too like STAB Limit at 70km/h? Kinda funny
1 Like
You genuinely base your sense of vehicle performance irl on a game like warthunder?
2 Likes
Yeah, except 1.0 BR up, and note they have actually slower reverse. (17vs34) Ur top speed is not a ‘strength’ at 12.3/12.7 either, like half the MBTs can get as fast as u, unlike the 99A which can pull away. 12.3/7 is a very different BR placement.
Strong dart…
And plus u can do that with almost any tank. (almost)
They did extend the composite, but welp Gaijin. Plus they for some reason reversed the change where the autoloader and crews are moved up so there is much left unprotected by LFP.
im talking about WT ofc but irl? the extended composite part or what?
17 km/h in reverse still better than Russian MBT (which is 11 for T-80 series and 4 for T-64/72/90)
and in my opinion VT-4 more like tank for filling up the empty slot
so the lineup (including Premium and Squadron)
ZTZ-99A
WZ1001
MBT-2000
Al-Khalid-I
Pakistani Oplot-M
All of this 5 have better mobility than VT-4/A1 the only advantage about VT-4A1 is APS (idk why gaijin doesn’t add the ZTZ-99A with APS)
Seriously?
MiG-31M
least fake leak list lmao
It is only a list of speculation, not a real leak list. It does have a few likely options, but it’s really just guesses.
Personally I’d like to see a lot of these vehicles, especially the new SAM for Sweden, Japan and China, the J-10C and the Thai vehicles (FV101 might come with Thai and Belgian ones too)
Bro got baited lmao
1 Like
Honestly im more interested in the Ito 012 NASAMs II. Proper unique system. Sure maybe not good but definitely unique
As always heres the current list of Nordic SPAA made by your local Danish Cope main
Also i know its probably been mentioned here before but for the SPAA for Japan the Chu Sam, does it have the same radar system as the Tan sam kai? Honestly that radar hurts to use so much so im hoping for wither some fixes or a better radar unit.
Also is the radar supposed to be so slow? It feels like it constantly drifts off target
1 Like
Comically fake list, if its even close to true I will eat my own shoe
Its a nice wishlist but yeah
It’s a different radar, but it’s very similar in setup.
Chū-SAM radar vehicle
Prototype radar vehicle based on the Isuzu SKW 464 (a predecessor to the SKW 475 chassis we see in game). Here it’s much easier to tell the difference in size.
Honestly I don’t think the radar is an issue, it’s Gaijins implementation of it.
It’s missing the 110° ESA search/track mode, which would allow the radar to be manually pointed at a set direction, where it wouldn’t lose line of sight to a tracked target unlike with the 360° search mode we only have now.
It also only has TWS mode in game, no proper search only mode. This means to turn a lock off the entire radar needs to be switched off, making it impossible to properly use the missiles datalink and LOAL functionality.
If those issues were fixed, the radar might actually be quite good, and I think the Chū-SAM would be the same.
Sadly that means the radar might be pretty bad if it’s implemented like the Tan-SAM radar…