when new playstyle for ussr or germany or US?
My god i dont get it. WHY DO WE NEED to add them different playstyle? Its LITERALLY the purpose of having several different tech trees - each having DIFFERENT playstyle. WHY DO WE NEED to make sme tree special by adding “different playstyle” to them? Why do we want having several playstyles in ANY tree making other trees less appealing? Thats some proper communist bs
1 Like
and its a completely different machine with one we see in chinese tech tree now
3 Likes
It was confirmed yesterday that it’s Oplot-M that is being added to China, the version that Pakistan used for trials, not the proposed variant that they would have purchased if they had gone through with the sale.
3 Likes
So again its “okay” to add trials to any country but USSR, okay.
Oplot M should belong to USSR tho. I would be okay with seing different Oplot in china, but not that one copy-paste machine.
I’m just clarifying what is being added, not trying to justify it being added.
same, A unique modification that was trialed is one thing, A copy paste that some crews took for a test drive doesn’t justify it’s addition IMO.
1 Like
I wonder how good it look like if we have a option to get that ugly side armor off.
doubt it would look cool as nude T-72s (and other 64s 80s) are ugly by definition
How about stock we just get a naked metal plate or just a downgrade ERA and we get that side armor later like a t90m.
i mean. do you want to play a weaker tank in stock?
I never understood why they did it with T-72A, T-72B3, T90M, Challenger 2
In the game rn that side armor (oplot) is a bit useless u know.
but i just want a option to take it off. maybe just make it easy to stock grind like put it on a tier 2 or 1 we should do this with other russian tank.
is it? heard people say it protects kinda like Relikt on the 90M.
i mean. i think they shouldnt even make that grindable, They sure must make people be able to take it off if they want tho
Proof me wrong, since the Oplot T rolled out the survivability is so bad but just a couple of weeks before the announcement about the next major update the Oplot T become tankier like 60-70% do you think it is because they are going to add the Oplot P for Chinese tech tree with the exact 1-1 of everything? I think they buff it because of this reason. What’s your Oplot T experience comparing Early Tusk Force and Late Tusk Force?
Maybe just because a Ukrainian ppl in “bm oplot discussion” fight for it? Maybe u just overthinking🫠🫠🫠🫠
6 Likes
Wow, that conspiracy theory is actually makes sense xD
Surely chinese bias Is upon us
1 Like
Chinese players need to find out that it is missing an entire steel plate from the composite armour, and the ERA is underperforming by 100mm, then perhaps they will do something about it…
…or they will do nothing cause it’s not a domestic vehicle.
So far only the Swedish and Pakistani (Chinese) tree have received trial vehicles (unless you count F-16AJ, but that was an unbuilt proposal, not even trial). This doesn’t mean other nations can’t get trial vehicles, just that there might not have been a necessity to add them over service vehicles.
Agreed, the modified variant (Oplot P) existed because this was the variant Pakistan would have bought if they had decided to buy the Oplot. In such a case I feel like the Oplot M only used to test the general platform is out of place.
It is often done in Thai service. The tank does look very good without the side armor
More images
5 Likes