true brother
I wonder how good it look like if we have a option to get that ugly side armor off.
doubt it would look cool as nude T-72s (and other 64s 80s) are ugly by definition
How about stock we just get a naked metal plate or just a downgrade ERA and we get that side armor later like a t90m.
i mean. do you want to play a weaker tank in stock?
I never understood why they did it with T-72A, T-72B3, T90M, Challenger 2
In the game rn that side armor (oplot) is a bit useless u know.
but i just want a option to take it off. maybe just make it easy to stock grind like put it on a tier 2 or 1 we should do this with other russian tank.
is it? heard people say it protects kinda like Relikt on the 90M.
i mean. i think they shouldnt even make that grindable, They sure must make people be able to take it off if they want tho
Proof me wrong, since the Oplot T rolled out the survivability is so bad but just a couple of weeks before the announcement about the next major update the Oplot T become tankier like 60-70% do you think it is because they are going to add the Oplot P for Chinese tech tree with the exact 1-1 of everything? I think they buff it because of this reason. What’s your Oplot T experience comparing Early Tusk Force and Late Tusk Force?
Maybe just because a Ukrainian ppl in “bm oplot discussion” fight for it? Maybe u just overthinking🫠🫠🫠🫠
6 Likes
Wow, that conspiracy theory is actually makes sense xD
Surely chinese bias Is upon us
1 Like
Yes China Number One
Chinese players need to find out that it is missing an entire steel plate from the composite armour, and the ERA is underperforming by 100mm, then perhaps they will do something about it…
…or they will do nothing cause it’s not a domestic vehicle.
So far only the Swedish and Pakistani (Chinese) tree have received trial vehicles (unless you count F-16AJ, but that was an unbuilt proposal, not even trial). This doesn’t mean other nations can’t get trial vehicles, just that there might not have been a necessity to add them over service vehicles.
Agreed, the modified variant (Oplot P) existed because this was the variant Pakistan would have bought if they had decided to buy the Oplot. In such a case I feel like the Oplot M only used to test the general platform is out of place.
5 Likes
it does not look for me that sweden and china needed those two at all tho.
its just a way to please certain playerbase if you ask me
Totally agree
Chinese MBT literally one of the best Flanker in Toptier like you have speed of NATO vehicle and Low-Profile from Russian MBT look at the MBT-2000/Al-Khalid-I got speed, low-profile, armor is 50/50 also 577mm of flat pen APFSDS | and yes Chinese MBT don’t have that much of protection compare to like T-90M and T-80BVM but you have Firepower and speed so use that instead for flanking not running straight head-on to where enemy expecting you lmao
1 Like
PRC is missing ROC Abrams.
Japan is missing Thailand VT-4. What’s your point
3 Likes
Did you know that this extra bit of pointless speed can cause STAB to fail?
Have you actually compared the protected area projection of ZTZs and NATO tanks?
1 Like
Since Sweden has purchased Germany Leopard 2A4(Strv 121) and Leopard 2A5 with improve armor (Strv 122) why aren’t swedeish vehicles assigned to the German tech tree? type question
6 Likes