Topic about Japan adds T-84 and VT-4

The word there is “Could be,” but once again, I know folks who have been playing since 2012.
Unless you can argue with people who have been playing between 2012 and 2017.
The game isn’t gonna die; it is in such a niche market that it quite literally has no true competitors.
Every “Competitor” cannot offer all 3 major forms and all of the sub-combat-forms of playstyles.

As all of them are either very early, abandoned, or mostly focused on a specific area and stuck with it.

The closest would be War-Gaming; however, that is 3 separate games.
Which focused on the Arcadey side of things.
World of Tanks and World of Warships are the only 2 alive games, as WOWP is dead. It focuses on the arcadey side of things, something that never works for flight-based games.

But once again, this has nothing to do with this topic, at least not directly.

true, I just used this topic as an arguement to say it can negatively affect the game. So lets move on…

as your logic. let’s just change some “word”
“Since Taiwan has purchased Amarican M1A2T tanks, why aren’t Taiwanese vehicles assigned to the Amarican tech tree?”
lol you’re funny bro.

3 Likes

and same logic as " I’ll be joining the American one since I bought a cheeseburger yesterday"

3 Likes

Too late for you, since China own ROC equipment from 2019, You already lost your chance, the only one logic for Chinese players is “You can’t love your Tech-tree only when OP”, for those who don’t care or grind China TT before, jump out suddenly and say some nonsense. Those struggle is hypocrisy

2 Likes

Thai vehicles have been in Japan’s tree since March of 2024, so you guys lost your chance to have the Thai VT4

6 Likes

trying to drag up the old ROC argument just to block a “Gaijin legitimatly place” like VT4 form thai line that isn’t “fighting for principle” . It’s clearly a desperate dustraction. Just stop squirming and accept that thai tank should belong to thai line please bro.

1 Like

CN TT already have VT4, then What are you talking about?

1 Like

Then American TT already have m60 m1a2 already what you talkin about

1 Like

So then You want thai VT4 in Jap TT is your business, Said nonsense on what Tech-tree you never tried or grind, how I judge you is my business.

1 Like

Waste my time to grinding for the nation that full of copy and paste thing? Let use a same logic what if i want to play j11? Do i need to go grinding for su27sm? Of course no. what u takin about bruh

1 Like

Then fight for what you want, the only reason is you only grind the Japan TT, how other techtrees going is not your business. as You said, after I grind all techtree, Thai VT4 is “copy sh*t” for me too, and I don’t get it why you guys want to play a 7.1s reload tank on toptier, If you think you can have it but you wouldn’t play it, then I won’t say anything, You will know what I mean when you acquire it.

2 Likes

Then any reason to not give VT4 to thai?
Thank you to understand me i already grind jap TT
So all i want it VT4. good or not i’ll play it any way cuz it look cool and im a “patriot” bro

2 Likes

Reasons to give VT-4 to Thai TT

  • It is Thai’s current and latest “Main” Battle Tank, not adding it is like not giving Abrams to the US
  • It will add new playstyle to Jap TT post 11.7 BR
    (3xType-90 and 3xType-10/TKX only with the same playstyles are boring after a while. Addition of T-84 is good, but with VT-4 would be better)
  • VT-4 to Thai TT means it will bump up statistic of this vehicle, if more ppl knows it has issue and raise up, the one in original TT will likely to being fix sooner.

Reason to not give VT-4 to Thai TT

  • Certain group of players unhappy about Japan

TBH, as another fellow patriot I don’t want this case to be a setting stone for Gaijin to not add Chinese export’s vehicles to Thai TT, as many has potential to add varieties of REDFOR playstyle for Jap TT, like Type-69-II, VN-16, VN-1 or even Type-62.
I also feel bad about those who put the efforts to suggest these vehicles since the old-forum, just to know that it got block by such nonsense reason.

6 Likes

That’s the point bro a “group of player” unhappy about it

1 Like

when new playstyle for ussr or germany or US?

My god i dont get it. WHY DO WE NEED to add them different playstyle? Its LITERALLY the purpose of having several different tech trees - each having DIFFERENT playstyle. WHY DO WE NEED to make sme tree special by adding “different playstyle” to them? Why do we want having several playstyles in ANY tree making other trees less appealing? Thats some proper communist bs

1 Like

and its a completely different machine with one we see in chinese tech tree now

3 Likes

It was confirmed yesterday that it’s Oplot-M that is being added to China, the version that Pakistan used for trials, not the proposed variant that they would have purchased if they had gone through with the sale.

3 Likes

So again its “okay” to add trials to any country but USSR, okay.

Oplot M should belong to USSR tho. I would be okay with seing different Oplot in china, but not that one copy-paste machine.

I’m just clarifying what is being added, not trying to justify it being added.

same, A unique modification that was trialed is one thing, A copy paste that some crews took for a test drive doesn’t justify it’s addition IMO.

1 Like