the article does not seem like a trustworthy source
The book is very good and provides a lot of reliable information; just because of one error, it does not make it useless. There are many books that encounter such translation issues. The rest of the book is reliable, and it’s just a small mistake. I don’t see why this should affect the comparison.
“the R-77 is totally superior to the amraam in every way bro” you are being lied to
What do you mean? The first batch of R-77 has more range compared to the AIM-120A, and the AIM-120B is on par in terms of range. However, in terms of maneuverability, the R-77 is superior. But when evaluating AIM-120 manuals, its biggest advantage is its resistance to countermeasures.
Russia has the best SPAA and best CAS it’s only fair their air sucks
This makes you look like the stupid one fyi, not him.
Ground rb stuff has nothing to do with balancing Air rb.
4 Likes
Yeah and america has a broken air tree therefore its only fair the abrams turret ring thing exists
See how bad of an argument this is?
9 Likes
Bringing Grb up in relation to Arb is just an inherently flawed argument, idk why so many people bring it up.
4 Likes
1 Like
This is a win, while it doesn’t fix every issue with the Su-27 flight model, it is a step in the right direction
1 Like
It is a victory but the war to fix the mig-29 is certainly
2 Likes
It is a long road until then, but hey, we are getting wins
I do feel optimistic, I’d say the Su-27’s can be buffed more flight model-wise, but the fact we are making progress is nice.
dont forget about the thrust vectoring buff to r73s as well
2 Likes
YES, that is so nice
I hope the mig29 recovers its power and aoa so it can be at the same level
3 Likes
That would honestly be so nice
No worries, as time goes on they will be even worse unless gaijin does some very artificial stat manipulation
It’s not artificial, it is well known to be underperforming
1 Like