Tell me how an amraam is going to miss you kinetically within its range?
imo amraam is abysmal off bore from <7km in. literally cannot hit a headon target in that range if fired at 65ish degrees off bore.
while with r771 I can hit 110 degrees off bore shots from 8 km lmao
tell me when amraam gonna hit a shot like this lmao
More explosive mass and on par speed retention with the AMRAAM while having an effective 8Gs more pull
You are not dodging an amraam kinetically outside of hobs shots or running it out of energy, and the aam4 is just as susceptible to it
you can
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1m5cupd/until_the_other_day_i_had_no_idea_you_could/
This is due to the missile having lower ability to turn while burning. It has nothing to do with long range.
it doesnt have a time to gain table
there is no significant difference in its pull between that point and at long range
good example of why amraam sucks. look how easily my r77 pulls in but i just out maneuver his amraam, which btw was shot before my r77
Whilst I agree AMRAAM are in need of a heaping of TLC…
The R-77 was fired at high speed, downwards at a slow target and the AMRAAM was fired slow, at an upward angle and by the looks of things, at a bad angle.
In that situation, you can probably switch the aircraft and the diver would still win
Like the abrams volumetric turret ring? How long from now? 4 years? Maybe 5?
IDK. They might just not fix it. Maybe when US win rates drop down very low?
wt players be like under a balance thread:
It’s true that GAJIN has a certain preference for Soviet/Russian vehicles, but I don’t think they intentionally made other vehicles “weaker” (except for the F16A and MIG-29 when they were first introduced). In most cases, they just needed to adjust the BR of the vehicles and everything would be solved. But they seem to want every tech tree scheme to have its own top-tier vehicle, even if they don’t have enough vehicles to compete.
I just made a thread to bring this back up… to clarify, I made this report only two years ago, not 4 or 5… but still, should have been fixed by now.
I want to make an Abrams bug report mega thread
they have though since the report went through
This shouldnt be winrate dependent lmao…
Idk i thought it was there since abrams introduction. Also these damn bulkheads bruh same thing