Mad？
The Abrams Reload buff is legit an actual qualification all Abrams loaders must meet 3-5 second minimum multiple tankers from the USMC and US Army have confirmed this from the 1980s to 2023.
But in this instance it while historically covered it was also to keep the abrams competitive as war thunder is not realistic as most changes are for “balance”
But the rest I mostly agree with.
1 Like
I literally agree with this, France has been voided and ignored when it comes to bugs and unrealistic things. So many people made suggestions and it was just ignored. France in my opinion needs a rework for everything. However, i’m pretty sure the reason everything might be unrealistic is because France doesn’t disclose a lot of information about their vehicles, at least that what i heard.
France should be one of the big nations as they played a very important role in WW2 and WW1, I don’t understand why gaijin or the devs won’t look into the other nations as well and fix some issues there as well. The only major update with France was adding the naval forces everyone has been expecting, but most of us want a rework with the ground forces as its unrealistic.
They like to keep adding vehicles onto the tech tree but don’t want to fix any armor issues or rework some of the vehicles and it’s honestly annoying how they just decided to ignore everyone’s complaints and suggestions about the French vehicles.
3 Likes
That’s not for balance, just gaijin doesn’t care about those small nations like France, Italy or China, if they want, these nations should get buff first, simply buff all of M1A1/A2’s reload time is unacceptable.
1 Like
It’s extremely annoying…
Considering the winrate of US and USSR has dropped to 30-40%, I am sure even if they get M1TTB and T14, gaijin will still refuse buff other nations’ reload time.
Gaijin is just dumb, like everything( i’m assuming )is supposed to be realistic but, digging into other nations I’ve found out how horrible they are when it comes to paying attention to other nations development. They want to make money and more money, well if thats their objective just imagine how much more you’d earn if you’d start working on other nations.
2 Likes
I think the truth is the opposite, due to the stubbornness of gaijin’s data researchers, which makes it difficult for some countries to be recognised (such as China once upon a time), and the UK and France may be facing this problem as well
2 Likes
N°1: Yes but unfortunately people would get mad bc it would be absolutely unrealistic. No Gaijin should make it same as in real life where the pantsir is so unreliable and so unaccurate that they do not deal so much on the battlefield as some western counterparts.
N°2: Volumetric is a good addition, brings more realism even though it has a few problems from time to time.
N°3: Spall liners could be good if they were implemented realistically, like it’s a complete balance nightmare to add things for some vehicles and not some others even though they all have it IRL.
N°4: Depends
N°5: No, prices in SP should just be greater. However you second point is very good.
N°6: Yes
Absolute first gen Rafale was quite limited in fact, I am talking about the real first gen, not the latter.
Not on a battlefield, it’s like saying that an AR15 can get a hit on a target at 2 km, it theory yes in competition, but on the bettloefield you would not.
1 Like
But for instance Leclerc’s reload can be 4 sec in theory and have 96% certainty of “no problem” but in order to have 100% certainty of “no problem”, the frenchies only use it at 6 sec, this is what’s common on the battlefield.
Literally yes, on a battlefield. We trained to do that on battlefield conditions, and did so on battlefield conditions. 5 seconds IS realistic for a loader. You literally can’t argue this point against someone who has actually been there done that.
You would never, EVER have the 2nd, and definitely 3rd rounds outside of the ammo stowage racks while the tank is firing. Changing the round type has nothing to do with the loader, as all the loader needs to do is know where each ammo type is stowed in the ready rack, and ANY competent loader would know where they placed the rounds before firing. Firing different rounds for the gunner is as simple as flipping a switch, and a different fire command from the Commander.
I cant reiterate enough, I WAS a loader, gunner, AND tank commander and 5 seconds was the standard. SABOT rounds could be loaded on average faster, while HEAT took a little longer due to their increased weight. If you want to argue the different shell types should have varying load times then that’s a different topic altogether, but 5 second load times for an expert crew in War Thunder IS realistic.
On the war thunder forums your qualifications apparently mean fuck all because a drooling armchair “expert” just won’t allow his views to be altered by facts…
2 Likes
3- Rafale is significantly superior to Gripen.
5- You’re right, Abrams should have 3.5 second reload for at least 7 rounds.
6- Then use exclusively Magic 2s like I do:
7- What? Just flare correctly & out maneuver the Su-27.
8- Pantsir is trash, and can’t hit any CAS. Which makes me using Mirage 2000s to kill them overly easy.
Soviets & all other tech trees need new superior SPAA in order to deal with CAS being OP.
9- Ka-50 is the easiest helicopter to fight against, with Ka-52 being easier than Apaches.
Fast TOW-2s aren’t meta at top against tanks which makes killing Ka-52 with Abrams easy.
10- If Russian stuff is OP why does it die as easily as American & German stuff?
Try play USA with 25% win rate, even with 5 seconds reload u can get a better win rate.
I came to the same conclusion. If this guy wants to tell me that my life experience isn’t real then why bother even trying.
…well, in a game where the top speed of the T-34 is based on an account from when they dropped one from a cliff and reached 55 kph before smashing against the ground like a watermelon… (j/k, but, 55 kph for the average T-34? Guess it floats when the Panther reaches that speed ingame and still haves a gearbox the next second, this is a game after all)
1 Like
France played an important role in WWII? They literally did nothing back then, except getting totally destroyed by the Germans.
2 Likes