True i completely forgot those exist too. Really depends on the loadout in the end. A fully loaded EX could bring a ton of munition just for distraction and SPAA ammo waste
Not surprised to see that coming from you considering you have no USSR vehicles.
Most “Russian bias” comments comes from people who’ve never even touched USSR.
1 Like
BMPTs are incredibly balanced now???
Okay, I have heard the opinions of Russian-biased users.
And what exactly has any of this to do with the comment you answered to? Did russia not have the highest 12.7 winrate in december?
Also of course bias comments dont come from people that benefit from it
It proves that you have 0 idea about how bad they actually are because you’ve never tried them, and you automatically assume playing USSR is like the auto win of every match.
Here’s the truth: It isn’t.
1 Like
I dont know where your obviously barely literate self got that one from but i dont. Use your eyes and read some comments before you write complete nonsense. Something thats “actually so bad” doesnt have the highest winrate at the highest br
Unless you’ve been going against Russia only in every match, winrates are useless metrics for judging “how good a nation is doing”
If there’s like only 1 Russian player in the match and paired with other nations, and the team wins, then it adds to the win count for Russia.
Similarly, if you have 5 Russians in the match, and they all suck and leave and force others to carry the game and win, it still counts towards the win condition.
And even if we go by your arguments of “winrates”, They are high not because the tanks are good, but because their CAS is so straightforward to use (The ERA of OP Russian CAS ended a long time ago but I do agree that Mi-28NM is ruining matches) The tanks are “objectively” bad and flawed compared to a tank of the same BR such as Leopard 2A7V or Strv 122B+.
1 Like
Which is precisely the same for every nation so whats your point? That you dont understand how statistics work?
Which, if you bothered to use 2 braincells and your eyes, is exactly what i wrote in my comment.
I actually think you don’t understand how statistics work because you keep bringing up “winrates” and yet, it’s easy to see that it’s an unreliable metric to judge a nation’s performance.
Then again play the damn nation first to see how cancerous playing it is, air or ground.
1 Like
And whats a reliable metric then? The word of some brainlet that cant even properly read comments? Its a good metric, because you can compare it to other nations under the same circumstances more or less
No tanks i have 0 desire wasting time or money playing that nation.
The T80 BVM had 1.9 million games in december. The fact that you really think manipulation like this has a statistical relevance has got to be the single dumbest thing anyone has ever written on this forum. If russia was some obscure niche tree that no one plays then you might have an inkling of a point but its literally the most played tree at top tier so the sample size is big enough to give a proper picture
But you are here insisting russian tanks are the better than others just because of the UFP?
Another guy that cant read.
No im not, im saying that mentioning weakspots as a weakness in russian tanks is dumb since they are the smallest in top tier. That does not mean that russian tanks are better and they, in fact, are not.
barely literate
same can be said about any other OP tank in the game lmao, there’s a reason why russian 11.3 WR spikes as hard as it does and let me tell you its not bc of the T90A or the T80UM2.
you never played any of them and it shows… merks get penned anywhere by anything that isn’t 105 or below and they vaporize, same for leclercs, you can just frontally pen their turret cheeck and ammo rack them or at least take their auto loader. TKX feels not great to play to say the least id take a Leo2, t80BVM or Abrams over it easily, it’s slow has terrible gun handling and paper armor, the 4s reload and good optics are nice but cant make up for all the other issue imo. The Type90 is really good on the other hand if you can overcome the horrid optics and dart but at least it doesn’t trade in all of its mobility like the TKX does. All in all isn’t this just a skill issue thread? The T80BVM and T90M do just fine, they have trolly armor that makes them survive stuff others cant, with the free SPAAs you also gain Pantsirs (yk the SPAA that outperforms most other countries 12.7 SPAAs) while also having the by far most potent CAS in the form of 3 different KH38 platforms (su25, su30sm2, su34) and the incredibly balanced LMURs that are totally in line with all the other munitions we have in game…
Idk as someone who started playing the VT4s all i can say is you dont know how good you have it with the T80 series, and funnily enough the BVM has working ERA, try the oplot, the ERA work maybe 1/10 times and fun fact the BMPT can frontally pen your turret in like 3 spots with its APDS and pretty much insta disable and kill you while you are blinded by the 30mm spam
No thanks, i can read.
But why were you so persistent that the weakspots make them insanely good then?
we can tell you dont play russia, we’ve figured it out long ago.
1 Like
Citation needed.
Where exactly do i say that they are “insanely good” because of the weakspots?
Well its not like i make it much of a secret
The smaller weakspots are in fact an advantage? The current toptier engagements are decided by who shoots first, so having small weakspots while the entire enemy tank is a weakspot is a big advantage, nobody ever claimed russian MBTs are the best, but they certainly aren’t as bad as Russian players want you to believe, they do just fine they have advantages and disadvantages just like every other MBT family in the game
3 Likes
You’ve been preaching constantly about how if instead you shot a T series instead of a LEO in the UFP it wouldnt have done anything and acted like this makes the game unplayable against russia.
Its like that since 9.3~10.3, but ever since that you can shoot a Leo/abrams, ANYTHING, in the breech to disable it, but they will be able to go behind cover before you reload, whereas you shoot a T72, theyre dead. simply dead.
You can always resort to sniping the mantlet/barrel on soviet vehicles because they literally wont be able to run away in time before you reload, whereas every other tank can run.
China will be a better russia if they get the KH38’s they were supposed to get.
1 Like
Because it wouldnt have?
Youve got quite the vivid imagination
AS someone who plays pretty much every tree bar sweden and italy past 11.0 the russian MBTs are some of the most boring, and tedious to use purely due to how crap they are.
their one trick, literally is armour past that they either get out gunned, out manuevered, or survive less due to the 3 crew.
1 Like