The Panzer IV is just sad, it can’t compete with the volumetric hell that is the T-34 or the buttery smooth stabilised Sherman.
Writing skill issue to cover up that he got it wrong.
3 Likes
Think you’re forgetting my slower abrams the 120S that has a 3K/D and is highly played. Wonder what your terrible excuse and handwaving for the metrics where the abrams is superior will change to in the near future since I’m almost about to start researching the abrams and have already had a quick play with the M1A1 aim. With which I found it already quite strong absolutely stock compared to the challengers I’m used to playing.
Regardless the facts stand, the abrams are superior in many metrics and the US was the favoured nation in the latest ground tournament where the US was selected by every team in every single game and had the best performance. They could have picked mighty russia with its T-80s but they didn’t, in a close range map of all places. The fact is the abrams capabilities grant it a higher skill ceiling than russian tanks.
So basically, skill issue.
3 Likes
Wait until they learn Challengers and Arietes are basically worse M1s with little to no advantages.
5 Likes
I’ve never really had issues with the hull of a T-34. It is usually easy to pen if you stay away from the drivers hatch.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
who gives a about ground tournaments? we’re talking about random battles.
The translation of this is something along the lines of “I dislike that you are highlighting that the abrams was being picked over the vehicles I’m trying to claim are better than it, even in the situations that I’m claiming favours the vehicles I’m saying are better than it by the best players in the game. I also dislike that the reasons it was generally favoured were the strengths I was attempting to handwave.”
You’re merely too low skill to be able to use the abrams effectively and understand it’s strengths it would seem.
4 Likes
oh my bad, the Abrams is clearly the best tank in the game because it’s being picked over other premium packs by new players.
Does not follow from my post.
1 Like
Nope. bandwagon fallacy literally is your entire post.
2 Likes
Not even remotely. Pointing out that the top players in the game use a vehicle because it has a higher skill ceiling and is more capable than other nations in an environment where they need as many competitive edges as possible is entirely relevant.
You’re merely arguing out of ignorance because you do not have the skillset to capitalise on the strengths of the vehicle and use it to its full potential. This is not a fault of the vehicle. This is a fault of you.
1 Like
XD bro complaining the Abrams is OP, whilst claiming skill issue and trying to use some lame tournaments as an argument.
comical
4 Likes
Yes I said the abrams is objectively very capable given that is a top pick for competitive games.
Yes I said your skill deficiency is what is leading you to believe the abrams is not that good.
And yes the best players will use the best equipment they can in a competitive environment, as much as this conflicts with your preconceived notions.
And yes you are comical for denying reality.
2 Likes
Premiums Rookie Nation
1 Like
I’m sorry, but your inability to do well with Russian tanks is not my fault.
2 Likes
He’s got a point.
Why should a very skilled player in a competitive setting pick a vehicle that’s suffering ? That’s like shooting yourself in the foot.
3 Likes
Does not follow.
1 Like
Because tournaments and random battles have basically nothing in common.
2 Likes
Such as?
1 Like
People in both want to perform good.
Taking apparently suffering vehicles over meta ones directly impacts your chances of performing good.
So why do they do it ?
1 Like