I put that ONE little qualifier in there for a reason lol
Type 90 and TKX are breaking 10.0 to 10.7? Good thing they are 11.3 then lmao
“not a single vehicle at 10.3 can stand up to these two!!”
Of course the 11.3 vehicles are gonna be better than the 10.3 vehicles, that’s how BRs work
8 Likes
not as bad as the M4A3E2 vs Tiger II (H)
god i love smacking jumbos with the Tiger II
3 Likes
fr lol
well im fightig with 11.3 with T-72b with no thermal, shit gunner sight, shit armour
of course they are gonna be better than 10.7 but the problem is they are too good. I saw yesterday 30level got a nuke with type90
On top of that you have the longer reload timer which is 7.1, only positive thing about it is dead crew doesn’t affect reload time.
The negative side is that autoloader can send ur whole crew to air if it hit by anything
It’s one of the worst 10.3 for sure, you can try bringing the T-64B up and you will be surprised how much better it is. It offers better sight zoom and more gun depression, which opens up a lot of spots for you to reliably hide your hull, armor is slightly worse but not by much.
ok thanks man
You saw a smurfing.
Its good sure, but not great pen, weak armour and not great elevation or depression unless you use the suspension which takes some time to adjust. It doesn’t really work too well against 12.0 so moving it up in BR is also kind of unfair. They’re both just slightly worse 2A4s with a shorter reload (and in the case of the TKX P) a better immediate mobility. And by applying the same logic, the 2A4 curbstomps most 9.7 tanks, so therefore, surely it should be at 11.0.
2 Likes
Worst round at 11.3, 2nd worst armor at 11.3, worse optics at 11.3.
Type 90 and TKX have mobility and reload, and that’s it.
They’re borderline a Leopard 2A4 with faster reload and worse everything else, relies on hydraulics for depression, has the worst optics and a pretty mediocre shell with a 1-2s reload advantage that is negated by a lack of crew members and the autoloader getting damaged.
They absolutely should be 11.7, anyone saying different probably mains them, they continuously dominate matches and are at a br where they are 90% top tier
1 Like
It can also absorb the entire round and negate any ammo detonation.
centaur premium top tier is also made of glass, cv90120 is made of glass, hstvl glass, not having armor is no excuse and they are not as weak as a centaur or a cv90120 so please stop creating arguments for your own benefit
You talk about the Type 90 as if it were a CV90, which even a .50 cal can penetrate, stop defending the indefensible! The Leo2A4 has a competitive reload, average armor, and bad shells. No one complains about the Leo2A4, and you don’t see the Leo2A4 sweeping the map. The Type 90 dominates the BR because it most often faces down-tier opponents. With its mobility, 4-second reload, and very good shells for this BR, it basically destroys everything. Armor has never been and will never be a synonym for weakness
1 Like
shooting at the only armored part
True no armor doesn’t mean bad tank, but you’re wrong, the leopards do curbstomp. And the 90B and TKXP are great tanks but don’t really get many down tiers seeing that 10.3 is no longer the dominant high tier br, 10.7 is. Furthermore, a lot of popular 11.3 vehicles are now 11.7, and no, the armour is bad. It’s volumetric at times but more or less any shot from a higher caliber than 30mm will be able to kill the tank frontally. And if gaijin actually fixes volumetric that will not be as big of an issue.