‘Planes like F-15E and SU-34 has worse manuverability compared to their fighter counterpart, and dies before reaching a base’
Lol. What???
So you dont know what a strike fighter is and whats an attacker
Attacker: A-10, A-7, SU-25, Jaguar, AMX, A-4, Skyrider…
Strike Fighter: F-15E, F-4, F-16, AV-8 and any multirole with smart A2G or heavy A2G payloads
You dont gonna have Air Spam with the interceptors/Air superiority planes what you use for bomb bases
4 Likes
Oh god, Oh god no…
Now we see skill issue at is best, if you cant even get to a base in F15E.
F15E outclasses everything atm on pure power and thurst, it’s ment to be a dominant fox 3 slinger on ARB and multirole on GRB , what it does exellent.
If that thing would get air spawn it would be more broken as 279 in 5.0
I multipath, so EF-2000 blows it out of water. Not saying the F-15E is bad btw.
EF is just much smoother to control, easier to brake due to canards, and usually faster sea level speed. Moreover, the F-15 is a large target that it actually more easily get splash damage.
Let’s face it. EF is a better fighter. My stats show this. I have 0.3 KB with EF, 0.2 KB with F-15E, and under 0.1 KB with F-15J(M) which is like the C variant.
You’re trying way too hard to be yet another AlvisWisla.
2 Likes
I think we shouldnt have a air spawn, but more improve the maps so not having targets only in the middle of the map and maybe also having high value targets so attack planes can use AGM68 or Kh 25/29 etc without waisting hardpoints etc because in the moment a lot of small weapons is better then guided ammo or big missles
F-15E, one of the meta fighters in the game… needs airspawn because it can’t bomb bases.
Now that is hilarious.
some Rank 6 aircraft could probably do with air spawn. Some Rank 7 or 8s maybe need airspawn or maybe need a forward airfield spawn.
But F-15E… The best fighter on the US and Israeli tree and one of the best fighters at top tier at the moment. Holy copium
3 Likes
Nah this dude’s actually taking it a step further. Calling him an Alvis clone would be a compliment. ( No offense to Alvis himself by the way)
1 Like
no offence, but only thing what those show more that basebombing is not the way to play them…
and that is something what I had to write couple times so it wouldnt be insulting.
Just stop making these vamlilad style topics with no real point other than pissing other players off
1 Like
To be fair, at lease this guy tries to give sone explanation.
Vamilad style is to just have a picture or a single in-complete sentence with zero context.
Are you trying to ruin 4050/ bucc/ etc. again by trolling on f15e？
1 Like
Yeah, At this rate, I can’t wait to see the removal of bases on all game modes and banning those dedicated attackers/bombers from ARB/ASB and forcing them to play on GRB exclusive :/
Airspawn for F-15E to let them bomb safely…
Bah…
Actual attackers/bombers I agree, they need help and have needed help for years. Dedicated fighters steal the bases.
For the F-15E, Su-34? No.
I love boring 2d TDM gameplay! I also love removing player freedom and sandbox elements because of a few whiners!
how would this ruin them, he’s trolling a bit with the f15e/su34 part but the vautour and buccaneer should be airspawning rn
He is Trolled a lot and makes the whole argument look null.
As I told earlier in comment no.3
I might agree with him about air spawning to attacker
‘If he limits them to proper dedicated strike aircraft only’.
But his claims about Su-34, F-15E and F-104C are nothing more than ‘disgracing proper strike aircraft enjoyers’ and giving ‘fighter enjoyers’ reason.
He just wants to bomb with every single forsaken plane that he has.
“F-15E is an awful fighter which has bad manoeuvrability. It can not even bomb the base. So we need air spawn on all Rank 6+ attackers.”
He said.
1 Like
not you again.
NO
4 Likes
look at his stats and you will understand that this isn’t bait and he actually thinks these things are needed.
1 Like
Doubt anyone would push for that. Main appeal of the game mode after actually controlling the plane and cockpit view is the fact that your fighting has a purpose, however gamified, in terms of objectives. Best lobbies are those where the finale is an intense race to whoever can take out a ground battle first due to equal tickets and watching Il-2s/B25s go to town on tanks while fighters scramble to stop them/protect them.
Only issue with bombing/attackers in ASB is that it’s bottable and abusable through rigged lobbies, which is solvable through adjusting how lobbies work, better moderation to crack down on “PvE only” and introducing mechanics that punish abusive gameplay (namely: suiciding into the enemy airfield to skip having to RTB and land to double how much score you earn in unit time; Intentionally & repeatedly crashing and ejecting to deny enemy interceptors reward for doing their own objective so they quit the lobby).
Well, I meant was
If a troller like OP keeps throwing bait as hard as they can
The fighter player base will get annoyed more and more.
Then they will gonna dislike the existence of the bomber itself, and I will get doomed by being banned from any air mode. Eventually. :/
As a tornado enjoyer, I understand why he wants to throw baits about the bombing, but his claim is ill-constructed and gets worse every time.
Now I believe that OP wants to spread hatred about the base itself and PvE players. As intended trolling.
Then some days later, I will be forced to grind and play Chally 3 for play Tornado GR.4.
Thanks to him.
Another day, another brainbleed reading your posts
2 Likes