This is directed to the dear devs and anyone at the company

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
1

This is directed to the dear devs and anyone at the company who actually has the authority to deal with problems immediately.

Guys, there’s a really serious problem with things here. I’m currently grinding Israel. But I’ve never experienced anything like this before. I’ve fully developed other nations too, but this has never happened.

So the situation is this: at 9.7 BR in Rank VI, everything was fine. Around a 55–60% win rate. Everything was okay.

Rank VII: Namer 30, Merkava Mk.3… So far about 200–300 battles…

So here’s the situation: in every battle I destroy at least as many enemies as the number of times I die, often even more. So I’m not just sitting around doing nothing. But what’s the problem? The problem is that somehow 70–80% of the players on my team are completely clueless amateurs, while the enemy team is full of players from top-tier squadrons. In large numbers.

In 99.9% of the matches the enemy is USSR/Russia. And what else is happening? My win rate is rapidly dropping to around 45%. In every single battle there are immediately 4–5–6–7, sometimes even 8 BMPTs on the enemy side. And seriously, this is what you call a balanced, well-working, fair-play matchmaker?

If my squadmate switches to the Russian nation so we can break this curse and hopefully get a different, less predictable match distribution, then after 5–10 minutes of waiting we get a battle where Russia fights Russia and Israel fights Israel.

Listen, this is really not okay. I understand that you want to prevent players from progressing too quickly in the game, and that you want to limit how much Silver Lions and experience bonuses players earn.

But why? Do you really think it’s okay that in 200 battles, all 200 times the enemy is the same nation?

And please don’t bring up historical arguments. Saying that the matchmaker can’t work differently because “history was like this or that” is nonsense. When in history did Russians fight Russians and Israelis fight Israelis like this?

This just looks like a system designed to keep players in the game as long as possible, hoping that eventually they will buy something. Isn’t that a bit disgusting? We already bought one year of premium, and we bought several vehicles as well. Isn’t that enough?

And on top of all this, the server is constantly struggling. Some nations seem to be magically favored, while others are neglected. You’re not even willing to fix bugs, and it doesn’t look like you’re investing enough money to have enough people handling bug reports either.

So please, if possible, fix the matchmaker issues urgently. That would be the bare minimum.

2

Bmpt spam, that’s what is happening. Those are highly effective against premium players.

3

In 99.9% of the matches the enemy is USSR/Russia. And what else is happening? My win rate is rapidly dropping to around 45%.

I’m saying that for months now. If you play NATO side around 10.3-13.0 GRB, you will loose 80% of your games against Russia.

Russia is NOT balanced at those high BRs.

4

Unfortunately, it’s true. It almost feels like someone suddenly forgot to model “NATO” vehicles properly in the higher BR ranges.
But honestly, that’s not even the main point.

The main point is that right now I feel exactly like someone above already wrote: the BMPT seems extremely effective against premium players.

So first of all, my apologies. I didn’t realize that by being a paying customer, by financially supporting the developers, possibly helping to fund their livelihood and their dreams…
I would apparently earn their wrath in return.

I had no idea that this noble act would motivate them to make my life miserable in-game and turn me into their favorite punching bag.

Naturally this raises the question: is it even worth buying anything from them in the future, if this is how “friendly” they are to their customers?
Maybe they think that after all this I’ll happily invite them out for a coffee as well.

It would really be nice if they could get things in order already.
I honestly don’t care whether it’s NATO or CCCP vehicles. I just want the game to work the way it’s supposed to.

1 Like
5

The point here is : if you buy premium russian vehicles, your life will be easier ingame (hence the BMPT situation)

But yes, all of this is true

6

Yes yes more misinformation mister french main

Lets not forget our beloved

T58
Turm 3
Xp50
New 4.3 usa jet

And many more broken premiums

7

T58 and Turm 3 are good but not op, and easily destroyable

BMPT is a whole new problem lol. It’s like, no way comparable to any other prems in the game, it’sz completely broken

As a reminder : BMPT/72 BR Topic - #7390 by SadRIPer : what is that ?

Even the Maus is more balanced than this

1 Like
8

Yes yes 55% win rate with 2 kd is not op

Now for you bmpt issue.
You seem to only know lower plate weak spot.

I suggest you to learn other spots, exemple in your video, should’ve just go for driver port.

Easy kill bam no skill issue.

9

I think people are misunderstanding the problem. The issue isn’t that CCCP tanks have well-modeled armor. That’s not the problem at all.
The problem is that NATO and other vehicles are not modeled properly, and their armor layouts don’t accurately reflect the real vehicles they are supposed to represent.

The problems already start with the fact that almost every Western tank can suddenly lose its ability to fire after being hit by something as small as a .50 cal round. The barrel gets destroyed, or the gun mechanism breaks.

Another interesting detail: CCCP tank crews immediately start repairing the gun, while crews of other nations first decide to repair the tracks and the engine instead. Honestly, maybe we shouldn’t even mention things like this.

According to the developers, everything is surely working exactly as intended. The feeling that a butterfly’s fart can instantly disable any Western tank is truly wonderful. Meanwhile, the 30 mm shells from the BMPT seem capable of destroying absolutely anything.

And of course, ricochets apparently don’t exist… unless we’re the ones firing.

10

I’m a bit confused by some of your statements here. I’m not questioning that you might be feeling like you are having worse outcomes in your matches but what you are saying about your stats and performance simply isn’t true. (I’m not putting any weight into your stats here, just showing that you are not telling the truth)

Your absolute best win rate around that BR is 50% (Merkava MK.1) and your worst is at 36%(Merkava MK.2B)

Your average k/s for the Merkava MK.3B is slightly less than 0.5 (k/d is almost exactly 0.5), you are killing one enemy every two matches. For the Namer 30 your k/s is 0.64 (0.77 if you count planes and k/d is 0.72 without planes and 0.87 with). Your win rates for these vehicles are 38% and 39% respectively.

If you look at your win rate for all the rank 6 and rank 7 vehicles you have played you seem to have an average win rate of about slightly above 40% of you most played vehicles.

At first glance you don’t seem to be doing much different than any other vehicle around the same ranks in other nations you have played. Your k/s and k/d seem to follow the same pattern as well.