Game hasn’t really advanced enough to warrant placing a GTX 1080 as a minimum requirement in order to be able to play normally. Gaijin simply has no incentive to disable ULQ, as visual fidelity isn’t the thing that attracts people to WT.
That performance limit was presented for people that argued we should not allow people to gain unfair advantages via settings, nothing else.
I already said that everyone should be locked on medium settings at 1080p@60, so there are no advantages to be had by exploiting settings or hardware.
Lets not pretend features are being held back because of ULQ.
Oh yeah, that’s why competitive players are buying high end PCs with amazing monitors. I guess they all have been lied to lmao. Just stop at this point, you seem like just another sweat that defends his own exploit while trying to remove things he doesn’t like.
It does, but if they limit our FPS to 60 it wouldn’t matter at all.
Wanting the game to look good and run amazingly with RTX (not to mention the fact people want to play games other than war thunder that are MUCH more demanding on graphics processors) hold no correlation to positive performance in games.
In a game like CS or Tarkov, or any ‘competitive’ shooter, those frames are precious for seeing peeking enemies before they can see you. In this game, and its movement system (40 ton tanks that have inertia) doesn’t mean it holds any effect of gameplay.
Why do you want it limited to console numbers? It adds no positive effects for gameplay on either side. Yet again, it holds no competitive value.
If I want to enjoy the beauty of the games graphics and models as smooth as possible, I should be able to.
There’s no coping, it really only seems like you’re seething to find something to be mad at and it looks like you’re trying to grasp straws. If your PC can’t run more than 60 FPS, you don’t have a gaming PC…
I run 100 frames on a 6 year old GPU, and the lowest grade Ryzen CPU from 6 years. I have no positive effect from those frames, but in fact, I’m being punished for it by not seeing through trees and bushes.
I’m seething but you’re here calling everyone that defends ULQ sweats or trolls ?
Your immediate defensive stance just proves you’re malding at even an idea of limiting FPS and removing your exploit. Classic double standard poster from WT forum.
If you have higher refresh rate monitor you do in fact have positive effects from that.
I don’t care if it gets limited if it removes ULQ from the game. Even though it’s never going to happen because people at gaijin aren’t dumb enough to limit it because of your single complaint.
par·a·dox
/ˈperəˌdäks/
noun
noun: paradox; plural noun: paradoxes
a seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement or proposition that when investigated or explained may prove to be well founded or true.
I mentioned the 1080 cause it is a great GPU for less than 100 euro where I am, you can find 1060s for 40-50 euro here, half the price, and it is still more than enough for a good experience, and it is probably also way more common elsewhere since it is the budget entry level GPU from 2016.
Your arguments keep going in circles, from my perspective you are just complaining that your PC is outdated and cannot go above 60FPS on higher than medium settings.
Removing stuff from getting rendered will always be more advantageous than any FPS or refresh rate increase.
This is not a console only game it makes no sense setting an FPS cap, supporting a wide selection of PCs is good, but not when it gives people on the lowest setting a blatant advantage, rework ULQ so it does not stop rendering parts of the game everyone else sees or just remove it.
GTX 1060 isn’t the budget entry level GPU, what are you smoking ?
My PC isn’t outdated, I’m just calling out people for their double standards.
In your opinion.
It pretty much does if you want the game to be fair and balanced for everyone.
You’re sitting here malding about ULQ and how it makes people have an unfair advantage, but you’re perfectly fine with people running triple digit FPS with higher refresh rates.
That’s my problem with this thread and “balance-police” in it.
whats ur point ? lol
if you want historical accuracy and realism then go die in a real war, if you REALLY want historical accuracy and realism have fun driving for 20 minutes trying to find a tank in a 1000x1000km map Lol - what im trying to say is compromises have to be made otherwise the game wouldnt be fun whatsoever
idk what kinda bullshit ur on “The developers market this as an “e-Sports Ready” title , yet the reality is far from it.” (wrong example my bad lol, i meant to grab something else u said) like i said devs gotta make compromises otherwise the game wouldnt be fun
^try actually playing microsoft flight sim 2020, thats realism and it is not fun
The whole premise of WT being an e-sport ready title falls flat on it’s face when you see how this game doesn’t even have an option to play ranked matches.
Not to mention all of the decisions that make matches everything but competitive.
The fact people can join a GRB match with only a reserve tank and 13.0 aircraft ?
The fact people can squad up and bring friends with crop dusters all the way up to 14.3 ?
The fact you’re allowed to queue up for a game with only a single vehicle in a multi spawn mode ?
God Mode existing.
…
The fact people can join a GRB match with only a reserve tank and 13.0 aircraft ?
The fact people can squad up and bring friends with crop dusters all the way up to 14.3 ?
so? its not like literally every game you load into ur teammates are propeller planes, ive seen it maybe 4 times in 6 months of toptier, im not sure how any of these points make it a lesser esports ready game
The fact you’re allowed to queue up for a game with only a single vehicle in a multi spawn mode ?
genuinely, so what? its not like it happens every game. making it a non prominent issue + ppl get to choose on their own if they wanna spawn in in a single vehicle and if they do then thats their loss, not yours.
God Mode existing.
what? i’m not sure i follow lol, i know what god mode is but ive never heard of it in war thunder, is that like a acronym for something?
WT doesn’t care if matches are balanced or not, as seen from my examples.
I doubt any serious esports ready game would allow that to happen.
People start games with only one vehicle all the time, premium warriors 1DLing is a prominent issue.
Them choosing to spawn only one vehicle is their team’s loss, which directly goes against the competitive narrative you’re trying to push.
I can’t really agree with removing ULG. The most, maybe a minimal spec increase.
However, one has to think of both the impact that will have on player numbers and the low-end pc percentage of players.
A good pc is expensive. For many people, logistically impossible due to a variety of reasons. Reasons I will not list due to geopolitical situations that don’t belong on this forum.