from what ive read online the difference between the PL-8’s is just the seeker head so the pull will be the same
It’s better in a straight line. It sucks against notching target. AIM-120 is still better because no one with a single brain cell flies straight
I have a theory that 80% of US mains actually make up the 50% of our nation that is illiterate (cannot read past the 5th), with the last 20% being players from other nations
2 Likes
r u joking right? because if not I will see it as bad character moment
5 Likes
you’re forgetting as well that the aircraft that carry aim120s are way faster than the su30sm so they will have much more energy and thus range on their missiles
Dev server has a copy paste n001 atm. It should have iirc 6 or 8 DL
PL-12 are amraam (or 77-1) equivalent in BVR
Also J-11A still has the SPO-15, having that at top tier is self-explanatory already
2 Likes
it having the old spo15 and maw at the same time was always so weird to me like old meets new
I thought that only was for later upgrades of the J-11B. Even if it does support datalink that goes that high the J-10 is a much better platform with better IR missiles and same radar missiles. At what will most likely be 0.3 lower br
The J-11A is literally the worst 13.7. Compared to the J-11B it has
Worse RWR
Worse Radar
Worse ARH
Worse FM
Arguably worse SRM
The J-11Bs radar is not implemented yet, it will be a better version of the 1492 found on the J-8F and have 6 datalink channels. The J-11A also has 1 datalink channel. The R-73E is only good for offbore shots, which is a capability that is not really needed in common ARB. The PL-8Bs advanced range and speed performance will be much better. The only advantage the J-11A has that the J-11B doesn’t is 2 R-27ETs.
7 Likes
I think I am going to die in cancer before the next major update goes live…
11 Likes
If anything. Evidence of WS-10 means ingame 11B is a block 2. So it should be an upgrade J-11B
But yeah, it’s an unfinished model currently (lots of things are)
Im just worried that gaijin will screw over china again 😞
all new accounts or first time since last update posters lol
1 Like
As a 140% joke, I never knew the F/A-18C problem was on the same level as the Turret baskets problem of NATO MBT. :/
Turret basket one seems awful and reasonable to deal with.
But, this one seems as nothing but an F/A-18 coping train filled with biased copinum. :|
IMO, No AIM-120C, No AIM-9X, or BR buff is needed for F/A-18.
The U.S mains are getting restless, there might be an update that Russians don’t get nerfed, they are having a full blown panic attack.
2 Likes
1 Like
me personaly i think we wait till it goes live till we say anything because the next step up for the usa would be a F-22A or a F-35 so i see what your saying but then again the f-22 and f-35 would be insane to add without the "5th gen"s other countrys get.
F-15EX, F-16V, F-18E are options without going 5th gens you know
1 Like
F-15C (late) or F-15SA would be more fair additions than an EX. That thing is a monster.
F-16V could be F-16E instead, but either works for me tbh.
Agreed on super hornet
Tbh it was the only thing I can think of the top of my head with the aesa upgrades