It’s better in a straight line. It sucks against notching target. AIM-120 is still better because no one with a single brain cell flies straight
I have a theory that 80% of US mains actually make up the 50% of our nation that is illiterate (cannot read past the 5th), with the last 20% being players from other nations
3 Likes
r u joking right? because if not I will see it as bad character moment
6 Likes
you’re forgetting as well that the aircraft that carry aim120s are way faster than the su30sm so they will have much more energy and thus range on their missiles
1 Like
Dev server has a copy paste n001 atm. It should have iirc 6 or 8 DL
PL-12 are amraam (or 77-1) equivalent in BVR
Also J-11A still has the SPO-15, having that at top tier is self-explanatory already
2 Likes
it having the old spo15 and maw at the same time was always so weird to me like old meets new
I thought that only was for later upgrades of the J-11B. Even if it does support datalink that goes that high the J-10 is a much better platform with better IR missiles and same radar missiles. At what will most likely be 0.3 lower br
The J-11A is literally the worst 13.7. Compared to the J-11B it has
Worse RWR
Worse Radar
Worse ARH
Worse FM
Arguably worse SRM
The J-11Bs radar is not implemented yet, it will be a better version of the 1492 found on the J-8F and have 6 datalink channels. The J-11A also has 1 datalink channel. The R-73E is only good for offbore shots, which is a capability that is not really needed in common ARB. The PL-8Bs advanced range and speed performance will be much better. The only advantage the J-11A has that the J-11B doesn’t is 2 R-27ETs.
7 Likes
I think I am going to die in cancer before the next major update goes live…
11 Likes
If anything. Evidence of WS-10 means ingame 11B is a block 2. So it should be an upgrade J-11B
But yeah, it’s an unfinished model currently (lots of things are)
Im just worried that gaijin will screw over china again 😞
all new accounts or first time since last update posters lol
1 Like
As a 140% joke, I never knew the F/A-18C problem was on the same level as the Turret baskets problem of NATO MBT. :/
Turret basket one seems awful and reasonable to deal with.
But, this one seems as nothing but an F/A-18 coping train filled with biased copinum. :|
IMO, No AIM-120C, No AIM-9X, or BR buff is needed for F/A-18.
The U.S mains are getting restless, there might be an update that Russians don’t get nerfed, they are having a full blown panic attack.
3 Likes
1 Like
me personaly i think we wait till it goes live till we say anything because the next step up for the usa would be a F-22A or a F-35 so i see what your saying but then again the f-22 and f-35 would be insane to add without the "5th gen"s other countrys get.
F-15EX, F-16V, F-18E are options without going 5th gens you know
1 Like
F-15C (late) or F-15SA would be more fair additions than an EX. That thing is a monster.
F-16V could be F-16E instead, but either works for me tbh.
Agreed on super hornet
Tbh it was the only thing I can think of the top of my head with the aesa upgrades
Would you like a list of US 4th gen with AESA?