Okay buddy, if you really want to say that Tu-4 need to be 7.3BR while B-29 should ROT in 7.0
because
-You ignore the major differnce between 12.7mm M2 and 23mm NR-23
-You ignore precedent on bombers that received +0.3-0.4 BR difference because of "SINGLE TURRET CHANGE’ when Tu-4 did a whole overhaul
-You also ignore Spitfire Vb/Vc, which are almost identical but have +1.0 BR(Three BR step) gap because of weaponry change
-Or maybe you also would ignore Tornado F.3/F.3 Late which are nearly identical outside weaponry but also has +1.0BR gap.(F.3 Late on 13.0 has AIM-120B and AIM-9M while F.3 on 12.0 stuck with AIM-9L/Skyflash SuperTEMP)
Then, for the same reason, how about sending T-34-85 from 5.7BR to 4.0BR because it is a T-34 but with a new turret? /s
Seems you didn’t get that straight even though we explained it for a month.
Because you hear only what you want to hear.
It is not my fault you never heard of the term ‘sealioning’, so let me tone-polish for ya.
You dislike sealioning, and you don’t even want to Google it and such
“Argumentum ad nauseam”, hope you like this term more than ‘sealioning.’
Also, did you forget what you said when you talked about “B-29 to 6.7” from your take?
“B-29 to 6.7 if Tu-4 is 7.0” iirc.
Because you just cannot admit that ‘according to precedents of other bombers that changed weaponry, Tu-4 and B-29 need to have +0.7 BR gap’
I never knew that ad nauseam can be a good debate, or you are having diffrent definition for ‘a good debate’.
Am I crazy? Of course, I am crazy. /s
If I weren’t crazy at all, I wouldn’t fight against the wall who cherry-picks the fact for months to debunk that ridiculous hot take that Tu-4 needs a radical buff, because of ‘both are nearly identical and the weaponry difference shouldn’t be larger than one BR step gap’
When I can just ignore you instead.
I explained why you are wrong with multiple explanations and analogies, and you are the one who is not listening to any of that, and just keep pushing “Tu-4 from 8.0 to 7.3BR, you guys are idiots who hate bombers and soviet vehicles, because you guys cannot accept soviet vehicles need to be in fair BR.”
This discussion can be a plain example of Brandolini’s law.
I didn’t said full no about Tu-4 at 7.3BR, yes?
I said,
A. Send B-29 down to 6.7 and make Tu-4 7.3
B. or send it down to 7.7 first, then watch statistics to check the impact of the buff, and if Tu-4 acts awful similary, then we can try to send them down further to 7.3.
It is easier to make a 0.3BR buff instead of pushing the 0.7BR idea, no?