The TKX(P) is far above it's BR

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
1

The TKX(P) was once the best tank from it’s BR. When it got out, at 10.3, was very quickly moved over and over, and is now sitting at 12.0 because of it’s exeptionnal reload compared to his BR braquet enemies…In the past. Tthe general reload buff in toptier tanks, modules nerfs, the BMPT at 11.7, and future even better toptier such as the M1A2 C, APS M1A2-Trophy and T-90M Arena-M (that is only .7 over; the TKXP is magnetized to it, it never have any downtiers), Relikt buff and others changed completely toptier; and the TKX(P) didn’t… nor it’s BR.

Can this justify a whole BR bracket over the other toptier MBT prototypes (MSC, Leo 2 PT16)?

TKX(P) is the earliest in-game prototype of the Type-10.
Even tho being close to other toptier MBT prototypes , all around 11.0,
the TKX(P) sits not only at a BR over ; but at 12.0, aka the BR with the most uptier games, and .7 under the most modern version of the best MBT’s.

Why is it this high ?
When it got out, no one grinded Japan for it, making it unpopular, and by this only in experienced players and (no premium could have made the grind easier to get to Japan 10.3.) So it was a very efficient tank in hand of the very efficient players.

It was indeed massively over performing, but going up to 12.0 is making it just bad.

With recent buff, the once insanely good autoloader is giving now only a couple second of difference against other MBT’s instead of the time it was giving you the time to shoot twice before the enemy could have reloaded his Merkava or Leo 2.
So the big difference is gone, and it is now just a worst tank in any way than other BR from it’s BR.

M1A2 is at the same 12.0, Oplot is 0.3 over it, T-80U are .3 under, BMPT .3 under, …
added to a non-existing lineup.

Does a single second quicker reload is an argument to put it a whole BR over the MSC and Leopard PT16/T14 mod. ?

image
image
image
image

It was once my most beloved tank, put putting it higher and higher is just making it unusable now.
12.0 is only full uptier against way better tanks, such as the incoming T-90M Arena, M1A2-C , M1A2 Trophy APS, …
those are only .7 over this.

My point of view is that the TKX(P) is extremely under armored.

image
image1630×545 292 KB

Wiesel at 1km:
image
image1690×621 262 KB

So I think the TKXP can be comparable to the MSC and PT16;
MSC is trading a better armor with a second more of reload and a slighty worst mobility,
and PT16 trading the thermal for a couple of armor and mobility.

image
image1176×554 125 KB

Please be constructive in comments; and Make TKX(P) Great Again !

2

It should be 11.7 easily, but for some reason Gaijin thinks it is better than Type 90.

3

This tank is just better than every 10.7-11.0. Don’t know why you want to make it overpowered

1 Like
4

Type 10 Prototype was battle rating 11.0, it was stupid, I took advantage of Gaijin’s ignorance, it was a kill fest given the battle rating and popularty of lower battle rating Premiums, it was full down tier matches after another. Type 10 Prototype being at battle rating 12.0 didn’t change a lot except you can’t take advantage of clueless players anymore, but regardless, still a powerful vehicle, only issue being the mobility which still unfixed, but 4,0-seconds long reload time, with JM33, definitely battle rating 12.0 worth. Some day when Gaijin decides that ground vehicles are compressed enough, and further expand maximum battle rating cap to battle rating 14.0 or so, maybe Type 10 Prototype will return to its glory as a sealclubber.

5

I love how Japan mains are caught between saying the Abrams is the strongest toptier tank for its fast reload, and saying the TKX and Type 10 are bad because their even faster reloads don’t make up for their shortcomings.

2 Likes