Again, i haven’t played on planes with them, but they’re quite good on the ka 52, launch zone isn’t really much of an annoyance
Actually i prefer these loadouts, more fun i find
But yes i need to use the Vikhrs and practice with them
because i have it and i want to see it fully kitted out? because sometimes i enjoy not being limited to R-60M’s with the attacker?
u’re as guilty as this guy who says giving an attacker missiles would be a good idea.
oh F-105D has AIM-9Bs, that means it’s a multi role fighter cuz it’s equipped with air to air missiles that obviously aren’t there to give the aircraft some self-defense capabilities but to pulverize the existance of a poor soul gifting it’s 6
are u conscious that the Su-39 carries R-73 ingame, right? at 11.3.
the only aircraft with IRCCM missiles at the same BR is Jaguar IS which sucks at anything that isn’t slinging Magic 2s just like Frogfoots, and to make it worse, it’s from an EVENT.
THIS IS A CONVERSATION, I have right to make topic about this, to hear about your opinions not your sarcasm or anything related to that, Brother I respect you, your like a nice mate, but comeone, dont be violent, this is conversation like any other one.
i am and i’m saying i want more air to air option than 2x R-60M and 2x R-73
it’s a subsonic attacker, not a MiG-29.
and?
Topic to discuss, and between us to conversate about it.
- why are u using an attacker as an air superiority aircraft. u must have spent ur money in a quick option for ur toptier ground lineup and now u don’t know where u could use it apart from attacker.
- u’re ruining an aircraft that already has difficulties fighting against fighters, and u want it to get a higher BR by giving it “historical armament”.
this ain’t F-2A at 13.7 without HMD, this is a subsonic attacker made to destroy tanks u’re trying to turn into a Fox-3 capable slow aircraft.
well i’m discussing, and that’s acceptable in the rules.
yes thank you.
it’s a subsonic multirole tho, literally the whole point of it existing
have you considered giving it more tools to fight against fighters, like, idk, some tools to fight at longer distances, like long range AAM’s
show me proofs of a document saying it’s multi-role and that specifies “air superiority” or barely “aircraft supression” or smth.
WHY DO U WANT AN ATTACKER TO FIGHT FIGHTERS!?
that’s fighters’ job!!! stop trying to fulfill ur fantasy of turning a brick into an E-2 with Adders!
why does Su-27SM exist if u can bring a goddamn attacker with R-77s, that surely is a good idea, oh yeah.
maybe cuz Flanker is faster, more maneuverable, more capable and more everything? why aren’t 2 R-73s enough for u to get 2 secured kills in an aircraft that’s made to destroy AI units in WT?
NATO is already getting pulverized at 11.3 because of you know what, but bro still wants Russia to perform even more.
Crazy
1 Like
Because thats the main goal in air RB, and it’s what planes should be balanced around.
if u use an attacker as a fighter in ARB, u’re completely out of mind.
there’s a reason for why fighters exist just like there’s a reason for why attackers exist.
Go forbid Russia get an accurate plane.
The best 10.3 11.3, 12.0, 12.3, 12.7 planes are all American.