The Su-30SM should not have received the Kh-38MT

Different seeker.
Not MT.

Kh-38 can be launched from the Su-34 and Su-30SM, I still have footage of it being launched from a Su-34 in a certain region, used to have a image of it mounted to the Su-30SM about a year or so back.

You guys are so pathetic that you voted to hide my post in which I give you the proof that you were asking, and then you are so lame to say it is the Kh38Ml not the MT. IF THE PLANE CAN USE THE KH38ML IT CAN ALSO USE THE MT!

1 Like

It’s the same 6x loadout as Su-34.

Are you serious?

aces_sZfzID2lXh

aces_qXF2DHKsVU

AHAHAHA, nope.

There is absolutely no evidence that the Kh-38MT was EVER put on any jet.

All published weapons schemes have only the Kh-38ML(E).

Please keep the discussion focused on in-game mechanics and balance. Let’s avoid unrelated or sensitive topics

He was asking for proofs about the Kh38 in those planes, then post a video when is being use on the su-34, then the flagged that post, and after that they say is terrorism. Could you tell me mod in what part I’ve done something wrong? When I showed them the proofs that they were asking they silence me and accused me of terrorism

Why do I always miss the good parts.

it was a post with a video of the Su-34 using the Kh-38 just that, and then this dude came and flagged my post with terrorism

The claim is that the Su-34 can use the Kh-38MT, and not the possibility of using the Kh-38.

If you post materials from the war - that’s your own problem.

It’s well known these aircraft are capable of using these weapons, all it takes is being in the right telegram channels. You don’t need to entertain these threads lol

1 Like

yeah man, these people are mad just because russia got something with a good seeker like the maverick have, before the kh-38 russia had the Kh-29 with the horrible seeker

Exactly like the MMV Radar version it has been seen at an arms show and not mounted on an airframe.

1 Like

I have been very interested in the conflict.
I have never seen a Su-30SM with anything other

than a KH-31 and air to air load out.
I do believe the KH-31 uses the AKU-58 plyon

The question is should it receive the KH-38.
Making the Su-34 largely irrelevant

1 Like

9ly68s
lol

12 Likes

I am also strongly against the Su30SM getting Kh38 AGM because the jet itself is a massive upgrade when compared to Su34, which is already stomping GRB, and with the Su30SM being a different aircraft type/class than the Su34, it’s going to cost even less SP to spawn in as a 2nd CAS aircraft, meaning the enemy team on GRB is going to face 12 Kh38 AGM in total (from a single player btw) lmao.

“just spawn fighter and CAP bro” when the opponent is Su30SM is hilarious.

Not even to mention there is 0 proof that shows that the Su30SM can even carry Kh38 to begin with.

1 Like

ah yes the AGM-65 that gets intercepted by the pansir and 70% of the time doesnt oneshot tanks while traveling half the speed

2 Likes

Stomping when it’s the only thing in the air that is.

just dont
more cas is unnecessary
TLDR:

9 Likes

Kid, pls. 6 rocket with ideal launch.
Only 2 kill. AGM-65 its useless trash.
SU-30SM can use 38MT and all weapon vs ground what have Russia. Its Ok.
But why Gajin nerfed damage USA weapons?

6 Likes