Wouldn’t the update be on Thursday? or they going to delay it for next week?
Probably. I think they’re gonna wait till the last second to do the devblog. Then the update rolls out the next day so there’s limited time for backlash.
3 Likes
Now the blast door arm is modeled, and another hydraulic pump has been added to the Abrams model, for what?
2 Likes
Reword otherwise they’ll delete your comment.
Had that happen a lot to me this week.
2 Likes
Thats exactly what they are gonna do, no doubt about it
3 Likes
Pff I’ve lost a plethora of comments tbh mate. It’s beyond a joke the stunts they’re pulling this patch.
One thats buggered me off the most outwith the treatment of the bug report for the A2C is the random ass floor plate in teh CR2 stopping turret traverse.
2 Likes
it’s exactly what they have been doing mate
Every bug report shot down, people muted, or losing comments for calling it out
3 Likes
With this amount of people? yeah sorry but that is going to lead nowhere.
2 Likes
I was talking to a guy last night in here who was in an abrams in 2007. Hit a 400lb IED that bent the basket floor, blew off the driver hatch and some road wheels, and bent parts of the body over the commanders hatch.
Turret still turned manually even though they suffered 100% loss of onboard eletric power.
4 Likes
Thats why I advocated an overhaul of ALL non russian nation mbt models and armor. Figured if we got the national community involved it would lead to a possitive change for everyone.
That said, part of steams policy is that gaijin has to allow users to advocate the legal use of their review system. If they supress people it’s a breach of policy. If anyone maintains those records and reports it to steam then gaijin also has a bigger issue than a potential drop on reviews.
However, I will say, even if its just you - its worth leaving a detailed review on steam and exercising your consumer rights. Who knows… more poeple might follow that example.
8 Likes
You’d need half the community to stop lapping up the slop they’re selling, someone else also accurately pointed out there are bot accounts leaving positive reviews on steam as well.
I mean do you think that modern MBTs which are multi million pound (dollar) machines don’t have a back up / failsafe xD
Like of course they have a hand crank system, even teh T72 has one incase the autoloadee gets damaged.
They did that for CR2… and made the model worse xD the rework introduced even more issues than it had.
2 Likes
SEPv3 hull in production below. Notice that the only place where structure has been altered (you can tell as it’s silver compared to the rusted hull) is the left rear sponson where the APU goes. It has been changed to fit the new geometry of the APU. So again the hull armor upgrades are clearly not increases to the thickness of the RHA on the base structure.
2 Likes
Almost 2k people are interested and invested in this matter, if they’re planning on massacring the Abrams and keeping it gimped that’s going to make them react, happened before and it’s going to happen again.
5 Likes
You can’t even see the UFP from that angle dude lol.
1 Like
Oh right because thats an armor change and not an added piece of equipment.
Good job even though the research of tons of other people have proved that the frontal weld line moved and thst the NERA array was changed.
1 Like
ψ I’m already sharpening my pitchfork. ψ
3 Likes
My goodness you lot are dense.
To answer the first guy, what are you talking about you can clearly see the UFP.
And to answer the second guy, I’m adding this in support of the idea that the armor went to the composite in the LFP by pushing back on those saying the wording “hull armor upgrades” is too vague and they could’ve just increase the RHA on the structure. This shows that’s not what happened as the hull sides (watch the video), bottom, and rear are all unchanged except for the adjustment made to where the APU goes.
And no the weld line didn’t move, I’ve already proved that in this thread.
5 Likes
Could they have adjusted the Side Skirts?
highlight it clearly where you can see the UFP and if there have been any or no changes to it. the image you sent has too much of an angle to get clear view of the UFP.
No you didn’t, at all, it was proven in the damn bug report as well xD
1 Like
