The standards to revise M1A2 SEPv3's armor NEED to be revised and calibrated

from the SEPv2 upgrade program that became ECP1a aka SEPv3
image

yeah the new under armor has equivalent protection to the old one its just a bit lighter (seems to be around 500lbs lighter) so no reason to include it in protection upgrades

2 Likes

This is good stuff, if u make a bug report and word it like this -

Atleast Gaijin would look like a clown if they denied it anyways

5 Likes

skill issue by that BMPT

image
https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2017/army/2017m1a2sep.pdf
just dropping this incase it has not already been used just wondering if it is worth anything

1 Like

on top of this from what i found the ied/underbelly addon everyone’s keeps mentioning was actually a weight shave upgrade changing the material of the upgrade from aluminium to light weight steel resulting in the weight decreasing with that upgrade so its irrelevant to the argument

this doc also mention increase durability of the turret basket so that might be something to look into

like i said above its about 500lbs saved
image
old belly armor weight
(2.65 us ton)

image
new belly armor weight
(4800 lbs)

5 Likes

yeah sorry i missed the part you said about the belly armor

but do these conclusions not more or less confirm that there was NGAP/NEA integration into the hull alongside the turret

I’ll get both mate, I’ve already got USA at 12.7 so i’ll likely play the British tree to get their abrams first, the aussie ones.
Also the US tree for me feels the same after about 10.7, the gameplay loop is the same, use the mobility, out position and derp the enemy.
At 9.3 and down it’s kinda different cause of the worse rounds, armour on the XM1 and MBT70, as well as the pattons (i really like the pattons and the 8.0 area in generaly)

they are great man but I’d like to see the sepV3 be different at least.

2 Likes

I’ll end up getting the US one just to have it, but that’ll be in Customs. British one I’ll use in actual matches.

The US one with the TROPHY might be good tbh, but it seems huge which means easier to spot

I usually keep the trophies, it’s why I used the T-72 over the T-90 for a while. Thankfully I can go back to the T-90 soon

I am pretty sure someone else already tried to use this and they replied that they don’t accept interviews. And yet I vaguely remember a few changes made on the basis of interviews? I am not sure how consistent they are in applying these rules.

1 Like

I dunno man i don’t evne know If I’ll bother keeping the game installed tbh, getting fed up of it.

6 Likes

I’ll probably still mostly play the SEPv3 and trophy for their looks (I also want to get their crews aced so they can join my aced SEPv1 and SEPv2), but you the SEPv3 looks kind of sorry capabilities wise compared to the other M1A2s.

Which is partially because of Gaijin’s decision to give all 12.7 Abrams M829A3.

6 Likes

Yeah, but even then m829a3 is really an insignificant improvement over the A2 round.

3 Likes

I mean it’s pretty significant with how many premium T-80U-E1s are driving around.

I mean , i’ll definitely be there with you dude, they look sweet af, i also have to get the damn Australian ones too xD

3 Likes

still no gaijin post about it 😔

4 Likes

One of us predicted it would be on thursday, we’re waiting

4 Likes