The standards to revise M1A2 SEPv3's armor NEED to be revised and calibrated

All in one, the source used by Gaijin.

This is what you should use as APS weight is also listed on it.
db_3_221223_940px_b1db6e8ae0ad046829917af4af93a705

you get all your military knowledge from warthunder and other video games huh

Maybe try read and look with more attention at previous post?

18 Likes

Video A2 compared to A3 functionality:


M829A3 Gameplay Test comes from previous even more detailed recording:

Even if going by the protection analysis M829A2 is still the same as M829A3 in functionality in-game, there is no real buff here and also the same in the fact that in the live gameplay both are extremely inconsistant in defeating K5.

The A3 is a joke and there is no real buff to the SEPv3 aside from more magic tons and some gaijins guesswork of turret cheek armor in a spot nobody shoots and was already near impenetrable


Screenshot 2026-06-12 230840
Screenshot 2026-06-12 230733

The hull shows physical changes along with many offical sources confirming hull armor upgrades, please stop fighting this report the 2020 Abrams SEPv3 deserves a meaningful armor change since 1979-86.

.

Update since gaijin says iv reached max messages today and cant post:


He says this without actually comparing… so i did


Yet again heres a recording of recreating his video with A2 round in the LIVE server with the T-80U showed in his video and… A2 does pen, again A3 doesnt provide a meaningful improvement so stop using it to justify not giving the SEPv3 its updated hull armor

⌃This is A2 penning K5 at 2000m much less 50m

4 Likes

Maybe you should do that too lol.

I have said that the SEPv1 is indeed a sidegrade to the 2A7 (the SEPv1 peak is higher, but 2A7 is easier to play), however the SEPv3 is a downgrade to the SEPv1 and thus also to the 2A7.

Yet you keep bringing up the SEPv1/SEPv2 as seemingly an argument against the SEPv3 being worse than the 2A7.

Also was this graph/image/whatever made with a correction for the SEPv2 weight nerf already or are these live server values?

3 Likes

Maybe try do better test

Like who are you trying to fool around. I did download Dev and recorded the difference. And the difference is clear

Yeah, it’s not like mobility is not only forward speed. Reverse or something and Abrams still better in terms of mobility
And would like to see how Leo gonna outrun SEP 3 at something like Sweden hitting every possible fence, car and etc

He doesn’t understand that protection analysis isn’t all that accurate to what actually happens in game… But hey.

3 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

Is it protection analysis?

Zenti’s showcase reflecting analysis vs Dev test drive. Hmmm, who to believe?

Vivid Video Proof > posting screenshots of inaccurate protection analysis and loudly arguing…

1 Like

Unofficial User Coded shells in a user mission isn’t the same as the dev serve shells. Zenturion said this already. You can tell I’m right if you looked down at the bottom and saw the shell pictures look like HEAT SHELLS. It isn’t gaijin coded shells he’s firing. It’s speculated performance placed on a shell he coded or someone else coded dude…

I can code the M829A3 to go through two BVMs frontally in a row what does that mean if the actual shell in the dev doesn’t come close? Why are we pulling up clips that don’t feature the shell gaijin is coding but what a reflect the actual performance of the gaijin coded shell? Why are we pulling clips before the second iteration of the dev server? That doesn’t make logical sense. At ALL.

4 Likes

That video was recorded before the dev server came out, zenturion was simulating the round.

2 Likes

Good one. He has two actually. Gonna fix

I was confused when I keep seeing the first video, because I subscribe to their content so it throws things off in conversation

I didn’t know about first one but watched second one. Thanks for correcting

1 Like

Let’s stay on topic

Anyways, the logic used by Gajin in the past was hull not visibly changed but now hull is visibly changed so it’s about time to get an Abrams with adequate hull protection against kinetic.

Not to mention the plethora of articles claiming the sepv3 modification was based on near peer adversaries.

The M1A2C upgrade was based on conventional warfare unlike the sepv2.

Gajin should give adequate ke protection based on this alone.

7 Likes

This is the best internet comment today.

1 Like