M1A2C Abrams: Heavy Cavalry!

Exactly, whats the point of this?

Gajin should just do it like WARNO or something. Just a unified RedFor vs. BLUEFOR tree.

Britain will be the most op nation because of this. Without even operating a fraction of this irl. Its just dumb. Air is the same. Tons of US jets added cause of this. Probably indiany Rafale soon. Well, too late anyways. Limitless copypaste cause some minor nation players feel old empire vibes. This destroys OUR game. I don’t want to see any nations own vehicles constantly turn against them.

5 Likes

In matches if you lower go for lfp, if you on same terrain level still go for lfp, if you higher don’t bother aiming at lfp, shoot ufp. I can imagine people still aiming when they higher just because they have this “A2 is no-no for K5”.

We talked not about damage, but pen. Of course in battle you go for weak spots, but there are situations when you have no time to aim or you could spare less time just shooting ufp. But it requires experience to sense angle and distance

Yup, if we’re positioned lower I’d go for the LFP. However, I have issues with going for the LFP when I’m level, it’s not reliable unless I am looking up into the LFP, so I tend to only take the driver and autoloader out.

In that case, I’m looking at a T series tank staring into my soul as he releases his 125 MM round.

Now, what I’m on the fence about is when I’m above the T seris tank, for general engagements I’d shoot into the drivers port, it’s more reliable. But on older T series tanks or less modified, like the T80UE, or T90A, I’m not sure what the difference is if I shoot into the UFP compared to drivers port

If anyone has additional sources, it’d be appreciated. We don’t have specifics because uh…classified, but: Community Bug Reporting System

Happiest hull I’ve seen.

Downloaded dev and recorded the difference in analysis
A2

A3


My only guess is A3 stats not implied within test drive but only in hit analysis
Hit analysis shows clear difference between A2 and A3, A3 can pen UE at 500m while A2 doesn’t

1 Like

yes hit analysis shows a different, but actually using the shell does not

Yess. So no more complaints from US players for the love of god plz

Why are you using such a low angle?

I don’t want my nation in British tree either, it’s absurd decision, i wish indian vehicle doesn’t get added in research tree in future , squadron vehicle or event vehicle is good option, i can’t nor i want to grind whole British tree just to play a tank i want

This makes more sense

Absurd

Whole tech tree concept in it’s current form is flawed, it’s just way how gaijin makes it’s profit i guess

3 Likes

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

5 Likes

Australian vehicles have been in the British tree since before subtrees even existed as a concept. There were domestic Australian vehicles as premiums in the British tree back when Gaijin refused to implement the RAF Mustang as anything other than a premium despite it literally being made for the RAF, because the import policies were that stringent.

1 Like

on thin enough targets with the impact point delayed mode you could end up using it as a APHE shell, doubt it be able to do it in game seeing how they refuse to give it its improved hull protection

Can SEPs get M829A2 as tier1 modification or stock shell like merkava4s and Ariete?

I mean until they make the SEPv3 a worthwhile addition there is still some stuff to complsin about, especially what is currently going on with the bug reports.

I would go as far as to say that when the M1A2C weight gets corrected it’ll be the worst 12.7 Abrams if it’s armor stays like this.

3 Likes

Gaijins choices are -

Create a Commonwealth tree which doesnt fix the problem for you - as US, German, Swedish and others would all be in the same tree.

Add them to the countries that manufactured them -
Ok Germany get another Leopard 2 or a Boxer
US get more M1 and F/A-18s

Or split them like they have done which is no use for
People who want to build lineups

2 Likes

How would Germany/sweden/USA be in the same tree?

I’d buy the novel about this and get the author signed on the first page.

1 Like

I’d go to the signing and get a selfie

1 Like

Japan with Leopard 2RI, Oplot-T, Type 10, TKX, Gripen C, Mig 29N, Su 30MKM, F/A-18D late, F-16A OCU, F-2A, F-15J(M), Type 03, Rafael F4, Type 90, Type 90B, Object 478DU8, AH-64E, VT-4 and PT-91M

One issue I have is what happens to indigenous vehicles or vehicles that were the only gap to fill if we solely go off this.

2 Likes