2x*
And how many of those players do you think will be using the sepv3 over the sepv1 or v2?
Nah they added a second t90m
Right, thanks for reminding me
And it doesn’t make existing logic disappear
If I I play M1A1 with m829 I have my chances against T-90M and T-80BVM
But if I play T-80U with 3BM42 against SEPv3 I supposed to be stomped
1 Like
His logic is absolutely bankrupt anyway. By his standard, the T-90M(The M Arena will be even more oppressive with engine ERA coverage) is one of the most oppressive vehicle in the game since it’s near impossible to kill them with stock HEAT-FS in 12.0 tanks.
T80u first of all gets 3bm46, second of all, that’s kinda how it is for a lot of mbts, like its the same case for the 2a7 no?
Honestly t90s aren’t really a problem, they are rly not that mobile and the reload is quite long, so they will still suffer in that sense
I’d rather fight the Leopard 2A7 when I only have stock HEAT-FS than the T-90M that has ERA coverage all around. One you can kill from the side, the other you can’t.
Honestly you would be surprised the amount of times I’ve non penned a leo2 a7 side with heat lol, but yeah I guess so. But I would still say the leo2a7 is still quite a bit better
He didnt even test M829a2 which can also do the same and at 2:07 he tweaks the games code and the rest of the video is a “what if” not actually whats in-game, and even putting that aside when at top tier where the A3 round mainly is, there is no difference or buff
2 Likes
Yeah, stock HEAT-FS experience is tough all around anyhow.
The fact that he’s using opponent stock performance as his main argument to keep the Abrams nerfed is ridiculous anyhow. Nobody serious ever does that.
Even if you couldnt shoot at the lfp, you can shoot turret ring, mantlet hatch, etc. and if u are even slightly above it, you can shoot the ufp and go through with basically any round in the game lol
Yeah, so stock performance. Why should a 11.7 tank not using its top APFSDS should lolpen the top of the line 12.7 Abrams over like 40% of its frontal surface.
You are not a serious person.
4 Likes
Holy whataboutism. Like if Air sucks why going in the same direction for ground? Basically what you want to do. Create even more difference between both uptier and downtier, between stock and top.
Broski, Gaijin doesn’t balance vehicles with stock/half stock performance.
They only balance a vehicle taking into account its spaded performance. This is how it is and how it always was. The discussion doesn’t have to go further than that.
11.7 T-80U struggling without its top shell against a 12.7 tank literally doesn’t matter. The same is true for so many other vehicles.
1 Like
And I lol pen 30% of T-80BVM with m829. And?
1 Like
If they don’t care about stock performance why they gave:
Free half assed parts?
Free extinguisher?
Stock APFSDS for 12.7?
The only reason that happened is because the community pushed back hard and launched a massive negative review campaign.
Gaijin had no intention of making those changes until the player base effectively rebelled. They want you to suffer as much as possible(without pushing you away either by giving you addictive highs) so that you pay to ease the grind. It’s always been their business model.
Furthermore, Gaijin giving players a slightly less painful stock grind has nothing to do with how they balance a vehicle’s BR. BR decisions are still based on fully upgraded performance, with a skilled crew as well.
8 Likes