The standards to revise M1A2 SEPv3's armor NEED to be revised and calibrated

A3 has 4mm extra pen btw, iv been testing it in test drive along with the A2 and there is nothing the A3 can pen that the A2 cant, like iv been shooting T-90A upper plate in test drive and it only 30% of the time seems to pen the top half of the plate sometimes which, so can the A2, theres no difference and as for everything else you dont need to have A3 to pen their hulls

2 Likes

I literally described how this logic exists, if you fail to comprehend it is not my problem

I’m gonna guess: he believes murica has to be mediocre at everything following Gaijin’s mantra of “jack of all trades, master of none” that makes them sooo damn stale once you get a couple more nations of perspective.

8 Likes

What balance lol, there is none, right now the sepv3 is just a worse leopard 2a7 with a better reload lol. Like its heavier so its slower and its protection has not improved anywhere near as much as the leopard 2 did

5 Likes

His name couldnt suggest any more bias along with the fact his screenshots show his war thunder language set as russian, hes probably just a russian main trying to stop his target practice from getting better

5 Likes

11.7-12.3. T-72B3A is 12.3. Hard to open wiki and check? And leave your skill issue to yourself. I have no problem dealing with T-series be it HSTV-L or Abrams.

480 of point blank pen against

Good luck with that.

Yes, give it to tank 3BM22 and their equivalents at best. Why not?

So people like you badly understanding tank to tank interactions don’t dictate balance

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.


Sorry, I’m just not the one to twist game for themselves to perform better. I don’t need that.

1 Like

It’s not twisting the game, it’s a fix for a vehicle they are adding?

2 Likes

Most of competent players with K/D 2> and 60WR> say that Abrams is sidegrade to Leo with being preferable for aggressive skilled players because of extra mobility, extra angle and full first ammo stage. And Germany has access to only one Leo with good hull protection, while US to a bunch of same Abrams from 12.0 to 12.7

1 Like

Like I said multiply time, give it protection against 9.3-9.7 ammunition but it shouldn’t touch effectiveness of 11.7+ ammunition

Either test drive bugged or what but zenti made good showcase

Said the player who wants to artificially manipulate tank characteristics to “balance” them out vased on their stock versions and on the notion that 12.7s shouldn’t have a clear advantage over 11.3-11.7s (T-72B3A is a mere 11.3 with APS tax).

Said the player who wants the game’s vehicles to be molded to their preferences through artificial means to have it easier.

15 Likes

The SEPv1 is a sidegrade to the 2A7s for good players. The SEPv3 is worse than the SEPv1 and thus worse than the 2A7s.

8 Likes

Yeah but not the sepv3 because now it lost the mobility lol so now it’s just worse but that’s not even the point, the point is, it got heavier, it is literally documented to have new hull armour. So why shouldn’t they give it to it?

Literally lmao

1 Like

No? Why should American armour be quite literally useless on their most advanced and protected mbt ever lol.

5 Likes

Yet T-72 from 11.3 isn’t meeting 12.7 Abrams. That’s the point to include 12.3 one.

You spend a lot of time playing sub shell.

They should, but anything that is unpennetrable LFP. It is not like when I played abrams with M829 I have any difference with others LFP. So and for Abrams with upgraded hull is supposed to be the same

And what are my preferences? Russian main I guess?

You have your players, I have my who are sitting in Nuke Speedruns top list and with tournaments on their shoulders

Dude, vehicles are never balanced with stock performance. Only spaded performance matters(with good crew). Even Smin/Gaijin has said that time and time again.

A hull with ~530mm that can stop 11.7 shells will still be penned by 12.7 top ammo.

And really, if we go by that ridiculous logic of yours, then you can downtier every 14,3 plane that starts with 2 missiles stock and horrendous performance. Like please.

6 Likes

The SEPv3 is just objectively worse than the SEPv1 though, even by the standards that you yourself just posted earlier.

And if the SEPv1 is a sidegrade to the 2A7, than the tank that is worse than the SEPv1 is also worse than the 2A7.

1 Like