“Please don’t link the classified documents!” They say with their hands covering their eyes while peeking through the cracks between their fingers.
4 Likes
His HSTV-L was cooked long ago.
HSTV-L is less (almost not) affected by this Relikt buff, but how would people know with their bad results
1 Like
Please discuss the hstvl in a separate thread
1 Like
What?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Because no one cares gng and ur just distracting from the subject constantly
2 Likes
First mention of HSTV-L, now go and bark at him
I just dont understand why gaijin just wont compromise with the US mains and just give them the turret ballast and aps into one tank instead of having both different, maybe add some extra RHA to hull and just call it m1a2c, because its a prototype,
also maybe add late m1a2 sep v3 later with NGAP and I-FLIR and the VPS package later
Especially because i love aps systems and this would buy me enough time to kill or neuter BMPTs
2 Likes
These bug report managers need some training. He should have put not a bug instead if he wasn’t going to forward it as a suggestion. Not need response then lock the comments.
6 Likes
this was on the trophy aps? maybe we should suggest it then as a modification, atleast unlike last time this isnt an outright denial “the seps are all different” or whatever
Yeah except Gaijin is going to make it a separate tank so they can milk it for GE.
Truth to be said, I am putting all of my focus on rallying others and creating hubs and spaces for our “operations”, but I am not as well versed on reporting itself as the current reporters have been, hahah.
I could give it a shot, but I am not sure I can do it perfectly.
2 Likes
At this point, Gaijin is actively and purposefully ignoring and rejecting any and all reports on SEPv3’s hull armor in a pretty much automated fashion. I hope this one makes it through.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/LSczIyvdKUuF
7 Likes
I’m guessing I’m not the first to file a bug report about the addition of the Trophy APS for the M1A2C. But let’s have another one.
Suggestion: Add Trophy HV APS to the M1A2C // Gaijin.net // Issues
1 Like
you should mention in the comments that as per a statement from the devs we do not need to provide the classified protection values
4 Likes
I was just making a post about that, actually! Hahah.
GAIJIN IS LYING. Back in 2021, they acknowledged that you cannot reasonably expect people to provide official, set-in-stone values for PRESENT DAY SERVICE CLASSIFIED VEHICLES. They claimed that they would “calculate values based on publicly available data, such as likely threats and requirements”…
Yet they are now rejecting just about ANYTHING short of an official value which, on the other hand, can not legally be provided.
Most recent comprehensive report, REJECTED WITHIN MINUTES without probably having even taken a look at it:
Community Bug Reporting System
24 Likes
just as you posted this 😭 i added it onto the most recent report (though i havent checked the info on it and i dont know if they actually did any calculations. Would be much better on a report with calculations in it)
1 Like