So many Russian shill posts in this topic just cause USA is getting the best MBT in the game.
Attempts to derail discussion by talking about Russian vehicles & weapons in general.
I think Gaijin could do best by taking more liberty in estimating armor overall across all tech trees.
Could it result in better armor for Soviets as well? Yes it could, but that’s honestly fine.
If it means we can have more interesting top end play than what we have now, I’m more than willing to accept that.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This thread is about the M1A2. Stay on topic please.
Its crazy how abusive the current reporting system is.
Like they can say its not a bug or insufficient info while accepting something far less detailed for russia.
To bad they dont have an option to report folks for bias.
I hope they give SEP V3 and Trophy abrams the .50 on the barrel with tusk kits
If you think a report warrants a second review you can use the report function on the bug report site:
I learned something today. Thank you for sharing Necronomica.
The VERY VERY least they can do is give the new abrams’ ROSY and LWS
Loader 50. cal and the other additions that the other SEP’s have
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Only way to get enough is for the over all effort to be focused on the unequal treatment of multiple nations and the ignoring of bug reports, delayed rolling out. Etc.
Edit, the brits and italians should see the value in supporting this given the state of their mbts.
Thats the problem, community doesnt like to unite against Gaijin unless certain feature affects every single one of them.
This thread is perfect example, people here trying to convince Gaijin that what they are doing is simply stupid, on the other hand We got bunch of people who tries to Defend this Companies disgusting policy while also bringing unrelated vehicles into discussion.
People should understand that no one is safe, today USA recieves double standarts, tomorrow another nation will but they seem to forget this quite often, so yea I dont have any hopes when it comes uniting under same principles with those people.
They are more than welcome to prove me wrong tho.
Please, this is not a bug report matter. SEPv3 exists without Trophy, much like SEPv2 does, and in fact there aren’t even pictures of SEPv3s with Trophy yet. In any case, a SEPv3 with Trophy can always come in the future.
Let’s avoid clogging the SEPv3 bug reports with non-issues so that the full focus is on the actual issues.
Right, we’re already on a thin line with gaijin (who are most defiantly laughing their butts off at us right now), so lets try our best to not give them a reason to strike us down for inaccurate information or for going off topic. Let’s focus on getting the main issue out the way before asking for too much :).
Cool. Stay on topic.
What’s the most up to date set of information regarding the hull improvements that community provided to Gajin?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
The actual fix is increasing the Merkava weight to 80+t but noone’s ready for that lol
80tons + removed all armor
Such as?
Not once have I told you such.
If you (not as in you you, but as in Gaijin) are planning to implement a vehicle and the way you are implementing it is the equivalent of 1 + 1 = 3, I do expect some common sense from them and say “hold up, this isn’t adding up”.
If they are just going ahead with their plan to make the SEPv3 a worse vehicle than the SEPv1, and arguably the worst 12.7 Abrams overall, maybe one of the devs should show some common sense and decide to just not add the SEPv3 at all if they don’t have the required data to make an accurate depiction of it (seeing as even their implementation of the SEPv3s turret is already pure fantasy).
2A7V armor implementation, BMPTs bluetooth ammo belt, SEPv3 hull armor implementation, SEPv3 turret implementation, Merkava Mk.4s, Namers and the list goes on and on.