He tracks me I pull back, and then he either perma tracks me until teammates come and kill him, or the fight resets.
Its not a perfect strategy to push your track out into the open like that, but youd be surprised how often it works.
Buffed what? 2km extra range, GNSS error range, and MITL?
Vs SIGNIFICANTLY worse lofting (to the point where its not even lofting anymore), Warhead being nuked, drag, gimbal imit, lock angle b4 launch, track rate, etc. which are far more consequential?
This is an abrams topic stop talking about helis.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I was gonna write a whole paragraph but this is an abrams topic so I don’t wanna eat up time but; MITL introduction is such a ginormous buff to heli gameplay that almost all other nerfs are disregardable. I can elaborate in another place if needed.
Get your M1A2 trophy before its too late; it will likely be more valuable in the upcoming meta than an actual LFP buff
1 Like
Man, I wish we had this level of traction on British equipment. Look at this massive bug report list. It’s been 8 days and this is already 1500 posts.
3 Likes
Yet, they decided to give a Reskin SEP V2 to UK tree
Instead of lore accurate CR2
2 Likes
nah its getting a sep 3 but of course this sub also affects the aussie sep 3 unless gaijin gives du to the sep 3 (they wont) then the aussie sep 3 would be worse than the american one
1 Like
Wait, i though Aussie Sep v3 also used DU, is that not true?
nah all export abrams arent allowed to have du inserts by law so they only have tungsten i think this is the biggest thing about the destroyed m1a1 that the russians show to own american but it only has tugsten inserts so its irrelevent
3 Likes
the abrams armor itself isnt even correct, let alone a baseline
datamine m1a2 info for cheeks unangled“genericarmorquality” is for KE rounds regardless of type, and we know it roughly has 140mm RHA
so we know that the protection is roughly 350mm of KE unangled but 800mm with 0.9x multiplier (lowball) is around 700mm of KE protection emphasis on UNANGLED, so we dont even get accurate info from the FUCKING CODE, DATAMINED IN DEV (there is M1A2 SEP3 in there)
10 Likes
Is turret ring of Abrams finally able to survive shots from 2S38 or HSTVL or it cannot?
I mean US as an in game nation has far more players and I would argue that the Abrams is also more iconic than the Challenger 2 for most people outside of Britain.
SEPv3*
And the worst 12.7 Abrams at that, with the US SEPv3 being the second worst 12.7 Abrams.
1 Like
no
Bruh
Big nerf because it will lose insane 5mm of kinetic penetration?
1 Like
The Abrams with symmetrically angled cheeks looks so cursed…
Especially if it’s the loader side being mirrored. Scary.
3 Likes
Doesn’t SAP-HE interact with a not different because of code and above certain parameters it’s better than HE?
I mean isn’t that part 2? And other chally threads exist for the Chally 1 & 3… Which heavily splits up posts about the Challenger tank. Whereas the M1 gets this thread, and one technical for all models.
I have no idea but I don’t think there’s any significant difference if the kinetic penetration remains close to zero (like 5mm pen on live). On the dev server, it still one-shots tanks most of the time.
2 Likes